Color analysis of storage roots from the USDA, ARS sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas) germplasm collection

被引:0
|
作者
D. Michael Jackson
Howard F. Harrison
Robert L. Jarret
Philip A. Wadl
机构
[1] U. S. Vegetable Laboratory,U. S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service
[2] Plant Genetic Resources Conservation Unit,U. S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service
来源
关键词
Convolvulaceae; Phenotyping; Color space; Genetic diversity; Plant introductions; Periderm; Stele;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Agricultural Research Service (ARS), Plant Genetic Resources Conservation Unit in Griffin, GA maintains the United States germplasm collection for Ipomoea spp. (Convolvulaceae). During 2012–2014, 737 sweetpotato, Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam., plant introductions (PI) were acquired as tissue-culture plantlets and then acclimated to greenhouse conditions at the USDA, ARS, U. S. Vegetable Laboratory (USVL), Charleston, SC. Single plants were transferred to plastic-covered plant beds to produce cuttings for replicated field trials. Storage roots were harvested from 690 PIs grown in the field and 695 PIs grown in pots. Color coordinates were obtained for each PI using a tristimulus colorimeter. Hue angle values (h*) ranged from 8.2° to 88.3° (x¯\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ \bar{x} $$\end{document} = 54.9°) for the periderm (peel or skin) of field-grown storage roots (n = 690 PIs) and − 9.4° (= 350.6°) to 96.2° (x¯\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ \bar{x} $$\end{document} = 51.3°) for pot-grown roots (n = 695 PIs). The red–green coordinate (a*) ranged from 0.8 to 30.7 (x¯\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ \bar{x} $$\end{document} = 12.8) for the periderm of field-grown roots and − 2.0 to 44.9 (x¯\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ \bar{x} $$\end{document} = 16.1) for pot-grown roots. The yellow–blue coordinate (b*) ranged from 2.8 to 33.1 (x¯\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ \bar{x} $$\end{document} = 19.4) for the periderm of field-grown roots and − 7.4 to 38.1 (x¯\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ \bar{x} $$\end{document} = 19.3) for pot-grown roots. Color saturation (chroma, C*) ranged from 13.7 to 35.8 (x¯\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ \bar{x} $$\end{document} = 24.9) for the periderm of field-grown roots and 14.9–45.5 (x¯\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ \bar{x} $$\end{document} = 29.3) for pot-grown roots. Lightness (white–black, L*) ranged from 32.6 to 81.7 (x¯\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ \bar{x} $$\end{document} = 54.6) for the periderm of field-grown roots and 32.1–88.2 (x¯\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ \bar{x} $$\end{document} = 64.0) for pot-grown roots. Hue angles ranged from − 13.1° (= 346.9°) to 100.9° (x¯\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ \bar{x} $$\end{document} = 80.9°) for the stele (flesh) of field-grown storage roots (n = 672 PIs) and − 29.9° to 103.5° (x¯\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ \bar{x} $$\end{document} = 81.6°) for pot-grown roots (n = 676 PIs); a* ranged from − 5.6 to 35.0 (x¯\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ \bar{x} $$\end{document} = 8.0) for the stele of field-grown roots and − 6.0 to 41.0 (x¯\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ \bar{x} $$\end{document} = 7.6) for pot-grown roots; and b* ranged from − 7.7 to 56.1 (x¯\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ \bar{x} $$\end{document} = 34.6) for the stele of field-grown roots and − 12.6 to 56.1 (x¯\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ \bar{x} $$\end{document} = 31.8) for pot-grown roots. C* ranged from 12.7 to 65.8 (x¯\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ \bar{x} $$\end{document} = 37.2) for the stele of field-grown roots and 8.9–65.7 (x¯\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ \bar{x} $$\end{document} = 34.5) for pot-grown roots; and L* ranged from 27.8 to 91.1 (x¯\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ \bar{x} $$\end{document} = 77.7) for the stele of field-grown roots and 28.2–91.9 (x¯\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ \bar{x} $$\end{document} = 80.4) for pot-grown roots. There were significant relationships between stele color (h*) and percent dry matter, with orange stele having a significantly lower % dry matter (x¯\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ \bar{x} $$\end{document} = 25.6%, n = 183) compared with roots with cream/white stele (x¯\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ \bar{x} $$\end{document} = 30.8%, n = 373). There appears to be wide genetic diversity for root color characteristics for the United States sweetpotato germplasm collection.
引用
收藏
页码:1217 / 1236
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Morphologic variation in the USDA/ARS rhubarb germplasm collection
    Pantoja, Alberto
    Kuhl, Joseph C.
    PLANT GENETIC RESOURCES-CHARACTERIZATION AND UTILIZATION, 2010, 8 (01): : 35 - 41
  • [12] Starch biosynthesis and genetic modifications of starch in sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas L.) storage roots
    Evans, W. B.
    Hudson, P. M.
    Paridon, K. L.
    HORTSCIENCE, 2007, 42 (03) : 450 - 450
  • [13] IDENTIFICATION OF ALLELOPATHY IN THE USDA-ARS RICE GERMPLASM COLLECTION
    DILDAY, RH
    LIN, J
    YAN, W
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE, 1994, 34 (07) : 907 - 910
  • [14] Expression of class I knotted1-like homeobox genes in the storage roots of sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas)
    Tanaka, Masaru
    Kato, Nakao
    Nakayama, Hiroki
    Nakatani, Makoto
    Takahata, Yasuhiro
    JOURNAL OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 2008, 165 (16) : 1726 - 1735
  • [15] Packaging containers for long-distance transport of sweetpotato [Ipomoea batatas (L) Lam] storage roots in Ghana
    Alhassan, Sampson
    Atuna, Richard Atinpoore
    Nyarko, George
    Low, Jan W.
    Carey, Edward Ewing
    Amagloh, Francis Kweku
    OPEN AGRICULTURE, 2018, 3 (01): : 596 - 608
  • [16] Proteomics and Proteogenomics Analysis of Sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas) Leaf and Root
    Al-Mohanna, Thualfeqar
    Ahsan, Nagib
    Bokros, Norbert T.
    Dimlioglu, Gizem
    Reddy, Kambham R.
    Shankle, Mark
    Popescu, George V.
    Popescu, Sorina C.
    JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH, 2019, 18 (07) : 2719 - 2734
  • [17] A comparative study of proteomic differences between pencil and storage roots of sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.)
    Lee, Jeung Joo
    Kim, Yun-Hee
    Kwak, Youn-Sig
    An, Jae Young
    Kim, Pil Joo
    Lee, Byung Hyun
    Kumar, Vikranth
    Park, Kee Woong
    Chang, Eun Si
    Jeong, Jae Cheol
    Lee, Haeng-Soon
    Kwak, Sang-Soo
    PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY, 2015, 87 : 92 - 101
  • [18] Recent Progress in Molecular Studies on Storage Root Formation in Sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas)
    Tanaka, Masaru
    JARQ-JAPAN AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 2016, 50 (04): : 293 - 299
  • [19] Comparing Weight Loss of Sweetpotatoes (Ipomoea batatas) in Storage by Three USDA Grades
    Arnold, Theresa F.
    LaBonte, Don R.
    Villordon, Arthur Q.
    Picha, David H.
    Smith, Tara P.
    HORTSCIENCE, 2019, 54 (09) : S400 - S400
  • [20] Comparative Transcriptome Analysis Reveals the Effect of Lignin on Storage Roots Formation in Two Sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.) Cultivars
    Du, Taifeng
    Qin, Zhen
    Zhou, Yuanyuan
    Zhang, Lei
    Wang, Qingmei
    Li, Zongyun
    Hou, Fuyun
    GENES, 2023, 14 (06)