Factors Influencing Physician Recommendation for Imatinib Mesylate in Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

被引:0
作者
Shrividya Iyer
William R. Doucette
机构
[1] University of Iowa,Clinical and Administrative Pharmacy
来源
Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association | 2006年 / 40卷
关键词
Imatinib mesylate; Chronic myeloid leukemia; Physician recommendation; Adoption of drugs;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The objective of this study was to identify significant influences on physician recommendation for imatinib mesylate in chronic phase CML patients. Methods: Data were collected via a mail and Web survey of a random sample of 1,100 hematologists/oncologists. Physicians’ recommendations for imatinib were measured with a visual analog scale in response to a series of clinical vignettes. Linear multiple regression was used to test the model, with physician recommendations as the dependent variable. The independent variables included treatment characteristics, communication channels, physician characteristics, social system characteristics, and control variables. Results: A total of 305 responses was received, giving a response rate of 29%. The regression model was found to be significant. Perceived relative advantages in efficacy, peer influence, past experience, and academic affiliation were significant positive influences and transplant specialty was a significant negative influence on physician recommendation for imatinib mesylate in patients with chronic phase CML. Conclusion: Treatment characteristics, peer influence, and physician specialty had significant influences on physician recommendation for imatinib mesylate.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 153
页数:12
相关论文
共 90 条
  • [1] Anderson GM(1996)Strategies for improving prescribing practice Can Med Assoc J 154 1013-1017
  • [2] Lexchin J(1981)Drug prescribing: patterns, problems and proposals Soc Sci Med 15 343-355
  • [3] Christensen DB(1995)Diffusion of innovation II: formulary acceptance rates of new drugs in teaching and non-teaching British Columbia hospitals—a drug development perspective Can J Hosp Pharm 48 7-15
  • [4] Bush PJ(2005)How rapidly do oncologists respond to clinical trial data Oncologist 10 15-21
  • [5] D’Sa MM(1991)Use of written cases to study factors associated with regional variations in referral rates J Clin Epidemiol 44 391-402
  • [6] Hili DS(1991)Factors affecting treatment decisions for a life-threatening illness: the case of medical treatment of breast cancer Soc Sci Med 32 813-818
  • [7] Stratton TP(1974)The need for some innovative concepts of innovation: an examination of research on the diffusion of innovations Policy Sci 5 433-451
  • [8] Buzdar A(1998)Physician variability and uncertainty in the management of breast cancer. Results from a factorial experiment Med Care 36 385-396
  • [9] Macahalig C(1989)Age as a predictor of diagnostic and initial treatment intensity in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients J Gerontol 44 M46-M50
  • [10] Langley GR(1973)Prescribing habits of physicians: a review of studies on prescribing of drugs: part I—III Drug Intelligence Clin. Pharm 8 81-91