Brimonidine Purite and bimatoprost compared with timolol and latanoprost in patients with glaucoma and ocular hypertension

被引:0
作者
Peter A. Netland
Michael Mroz
Sarah A. Rosner
Barry Katzman
Jonathan I. Macy
机构
[1] University of Tennessee Health Science Center,Department of Ophthalmology
[2] Ophthalmic Research Associates,undefined
[3] Inc.,undefined
[4] West Coast Eye Care Associates,undefined
[5] Macy Eye Center,undefined
来源
Advances in Therapy | 2003年 / 20卷
关键词
bimatoprost; brimonidine; Purite; latanoprost; timolol; glaucoma; intraocular pressure;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This 3-month multicenter, investigator-masked, parallel-group study compared brimonidine Purite and bimatoprost (brimP/bim) with timolol gel-forming solution and latanoprost (tim/latan) in 28 patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. IOP was measured at baseline and 2 hours after morning instillation at weeks 2, 4, and 12. The primary outcome measure was the mean IOP reduction from baseline. Secondary measures were the percentage of patients in each group who achieved specific low target pressures and the incidence of adverse events. Mean IOP at baseline was 24.8 mm Hg in each group. At follow-up visits, mean reductions from baseline ranged from 8.5 to 9.0 mm Hg with brimP/bim and from 7.5 to7.7 mm Hg with tim/latan. More patients achieved low target pressures with brimP/bim. At week 12, 69.2% of brimP/bim patients and 27.3% of tim/latan patients had IOPs of 16 mm Hg or lower (P = .024). Both regimens were well tolerated, and adverse events were infrequent. The combination of brimonidine Purite and bimatoprost was well tolerated and at least as effective as Timoptic-XE and latanoprost in reducing IOP. More patients achieved low target IOPs with brimonidine Purite and bimatoprost than with Timoptic-XE and latanoprost. A larger study is needed to confirm these results.
引用
收藏
页码:20 / 30
页数:10
相关论文
共 111 条
[1]  
Coakes RL(1978)The mechanism of timolol in lowering intraocular pressure in the normal eye Arch Ophthalmol. 96 2045-2048
[2]  
Brubaker RF(1993)Effects of PhXA41, a new prostaglandin F2 alpha analog, on aqueous humor dynamics in human eyes Ophthalmology 100 1297-1304
[3]  
Toris CB(2002)A comparison of once-daily morning vs evening dosing of concomitant latanoprost/timolol Am J Ophthalmol 133 753-757
[4]  
Camras CB(1999)Intraocular pressure-lowering effects of latanoprost monotherapy versus latanoprost or pilocarpine in combination with timolol: a randomized, observer-masked multicenter study in patients with open-angle glaucoma J Glaucoma 8 24-30
[5]  
Yablonski ME(2000)Comparison of the efficacy and safety of latanoprost 0.005% compared to brimonidine 0.2% or dorzolamide 2% when added to a topical beta-adrenergic blocker in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 16 251-259
[6]  
Konstas AG(1999)Efficacy and safety of timolol solution once daily vs timolol gel added to latanoprost Am J Ophthalmol 128 692-696
[7]  
Nakos E(2000)Pharmacological therapy for glaucoma: a review Drugs 59 411-434
[8]  
Tersis I(2000)Antiglaucoma medications: a review of safety and tolerability issues related to their use Clin Ther 22 167-208
[9]  
Lallos NA(2000)Effects of glaucoma medications on the cardiorespiratory and intraocular pressure status of newly diagnosed glaucoma patients Br J Ophthalmol 84 710-713
[10]  
Leech JN(2001)Travoprost compared with latanoprost and timolol in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension Am J Ophthalmol 132 472-484