Carbon stock growth in a forest stand: The power of age

被引:25
作者
Alexandrov G.A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Office for Global Environmental Database, Center for Global Environmental Research, National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8506
[2] Laboratory of Mathematical Ecology, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 109017
关键词
Carbon Stock; Forest Stand; Carbon Sink; Tree Biomass; Stand Growth;
D O I
10.1186/1750-0680-2-4
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Understanding the relationship between the age of a forest stand and its biomass is essential for managing the forest component of the global carbon cycle. Since biomass increases with stand age, postponing harvesting to the age of biological maturity may result in the formation of a large carbon sink. This article quantifies the carbon sequestration capacity of forests by suggesting a default rule to link carbon stock and stand age. Results: The age dependence of forest biomass is shown to be a power-law monomial where the power of age is theoretically estimated to be 4/5. This theoretical estimate is close to the known empirical estimate; therefore, it provides a scientific basis for a quick and transparent assessment of the benefits of postponing the harvest, suggesting that the annual magnitude of the sink induced by delayed harvest lies in the range of 1-2% of the baseline carbon stock. Conclusion: The results of this study imply that forest age could be used as an easily understood and scientifically sound measure of the progress in complying with national targets on the protection and enhancement of forest carbon sinks. © 2007 Alexandrov; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Watson R.T., Noble I.R., Bolin B., Ravindranath N.H., Verardo D.J., Dokken D.J., Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry, (2000)
[2]  
Chambers J.Q., Higuchi N., Tribuzy E.S., Trumbore S.E., Carbon sink for a century, Nature, 410, (2001)
[3]  
Boisvenue C., Running S.W., Impacts of climate change on natural forest productivity - Evidence since the middle of the 20th century, Global Change Biology, 12, pp. 862-882, (2006)
[4]  
Schultze E.D., Wirth C., Heimann M., Managing Forests After Kyoto, Science, 289, pp. 2058-2059, (2001)
[5]  
Birdsey R.A., Carbon accounting rules and guidelines for the United States forest sector, Journal of Environmental Quality, 35, pp. 1518-1524, (2006)
[6]  
Canadell J.G., Dickinson R., Hibbard K., Raupach M., Young O., Global Carbon Project (2003) Science Framework and Implementation, 1, (2003)
[7]  
Obersteiner M., Azar C., Kauppi P., Mollersten K., Moreira J., Nilsson S., Read P., Riahi K., Schlamadinger B., Yamagata Y., Yan J., van Ypersele J.P., Managing climate risk, Science, 294, pp. 786-787, (2001)
[8]  
Alexandrov G.A., Yamagata Y., Net biome production of managed forests in Japan, Science in China (Series C), 45, pp. 109-115, (2002)
[9]  
Amano M., Incorporating climate considerations into the national forest basic plan in Japan, Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 27, (1997)
[10]  
Kindermann G., Obersteiner M., Rametsteiner E., McCallum I., Predicting the deforestation-trend under different carbon-prices, Carbon Balance and Management, 1, (2006)