Retrospective comparison of patient outcomes after in-person and telephone results disclosure counseling for BRCA1/2 genetic testing

被引:0
|
作者
Courtney Doughty Rice
Jennifer Gamm Ruschman
Lisa J. Martin
Jennifer B. Manders
Erin Miller
机构
[1] University of Cincinnati,Genetic Counseling Graduate Program, College of Allied Health Sciences
[2] Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center,Division of Human Genetics
[3] Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center,Center for Epidemiology and Biostatistics
[4] The Christ Hospital,Oncoplastic Surgery
[5] Sacred Heart Hospital,Heart Institute
[6] Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center,undefined
来源
Familial Cancer | 2010年 / 9卷
关键词
BRCA1; BRCA2; Breast cancer; Genetic testing; Hereditary cancer; Results disclosure; Telephone counseling;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Telephone disclosure of BRCA1/2 molecular genetic test results has been proposed as a feasible alternative to traditional in-person results disclosure. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between method of result disclosure with the patient outcome variables of knowledge, cancer worry, cancer risk perception, satisfaction, and cancer screening and prophylactic surgery behaviors. Study participants included 228 women who completed retrospective, self-administered, mailed surveys regarding their pre-test genetic counseling and results disclosure. No significant relationships were found between result disclosure method and the outcome variables investigated. A majority (90%) of individuals who received positive results by telephone returned for follow up visits. Factors which genetic counselors believed influenced their clinical decision to offer telephone disclosure, such as history of breast cancer, a priori risk of genetic mutation and family history of known mutation were not shown to significantly impact the actual disclosure method. This study suggests that telephone results disclosure is clinically appropriate when counselors utilize their clinical judgment to determine which patients are appropriate candidates.
引用
收藏
页码:203 / 212
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Patient and genetic counselor perceptions of in-person versus telephone genetic counseling for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer
    Aryana S. Jacobs
    Marc D. Schwartz
    Heiddis Valdimarsdottir
    Rachel H. Nusbaum
    Gillian W. Hooker
    Tiffani A. DeMarco
    Jessica E. Heinzmann
    Wendy McKinnon
    Shelley R. McCormick
    Claire Davis
    Andrea D. Forman
    Alexandra Perez Lebensohn
    Emily Dalton
    Diana Moglia Tully
    Kristi D. Graves
    Morgan Similuk
    Scott Kelly
    Beth N. Peshkin
    Familial Cancer, 2016, 15 : 529 - 539
  • [32] Randomized Noninferiority Trial of Telephone vs In-Person Disclosure of Germline Cancer Genetic Test Results
    Bradbury, Angela R.
    Patrick-Miller, Linda J.
    Egleston, Brian L.
    Hall, Michael J.
    Domchek, Susan M.
    Daly, Mary B.
    Ganschow, Pamela
    Grana, Generosa
    Olopade, Olufunmilayo I.
    Fetzer, Dominique
    Brandt, Amanda
    Chambers, Rachelle
    Clark, Dana F.
    Forman, Andrea
    Gaber, Rikki
    Gulden, Cassandra
    Horte, Janice
    Long, Jessica M.
    Lucas, Terra
    Madaan, Shreshtha
    Mattie, Kristin
    McKenna, Danielle
    Montgomery, Susan
    Nielsen, Sarah
    Powers, Jacquelyn
    Rainey, Kim
    Rybak, Christina
    Savage, Michelle
    Seelaus, Christina
    Stoll, Jessica
    Stopfer, Jill E.
    Yao, Xinxin
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2018, 110 (09): : 985 - 993
  • [33] BRCA1/2 genetic testing uptake and psychosocial outcomes in men
    Kristi D. Graves
    Rhoda Gatammah
    Beth N. Peshkin
    Ayelet Krieger
    Christy Gell
    Heiddis B. Valdimarsdottir
    Marc D. Schwartz
    Familial Cancer, 2011, 10 : 213 - 223
  • [34] BRCA1/2 genetic testing uptake and psychosocial outcomes in men
    Graves, Kristi D.
    Gatammah, Rhoda
    Peshkin, Beth N.
    Krieger, Ayelet
    Gell, Christy
    Valdimarsdottir, Heiddis B.
    Schwartz, Marc D.
    FAMILIAL CANCER, 2011, 10 (02) : 213 - 223
  • [35] Family communication of genetic test results and uptake of genetic testing in a diverse population of BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) carriers
    Fehniger, J.
    Lin, F.
    Beattie, M.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2012, 127 (01) : S22 - S23
  • [36] Cost of genetic counseling and testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 breast cancer susceptibility mutations
    Lawrence, WF
    Peshkin, BN
    Liang, WC
    Isaacs, C
    Lerman, C
    Mandelblatt, JS
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2001, 10 (05) : 475 - 481
  • [37] Telephone genetic counseling for high-risk women undergoing BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing:: Rationale and development of a randomized controlled trial
    Peshkin, Beth N.
    DeMarco, Tiffani A.
    Graves, Kristi D.
    Brown, Karen
    Nusbaum, Rachel H.
    Moglia, Diana
    Forman, Andrea
    Valdimarsdottir, Heiddis
    Schwartz, Marc D.
    GENETIC TESTING, 2008, 12 (01): : 37 - 52
  • [38] Parental disclosure of positive BRCA1/2 mutation status to children 10 years after genetic testing
    Troian, Jais
    Apostolidis, Themis
    Touzani, Rajae
    Mouret-Fourme, Emmanuelle
    Stoppa-Lyonnet, Dominique
    Lasset, Christine
    Berthet, Pascaline
    Julian-Reynier, Claire
    Mancini, Julien
    Nogues, Catherine
    Bouhnik, Anne-Deborah
    PSYCHOLOGY HEALTH & MEDICINE, 2020, 25 (06) : 756 - 766
  • [39] Genetic counselor opinions of, and experiences with telephone communication of BRCA1/2 test results
    Bradbury, A. R.
    Patrick-Miller, L.
    Fetzer, D.
    Egleston, B.
    Cummings, S. A.
    Forman, A.
    Bealin, L.
    Peterson, C.
    Corbman, M.
    O'Connell, J.
    Daly, M. B.
    CLINICAL GENETICS, 2011, 79 (02) : 125 - 131
  • [40] A descriptive study of BRCA1 testing and reactions to disclosure of test results
    Lynch, HT
    Lemon, SJ
    Durham, C
    Tinley, ST
    Connolly, C
    Lynch, JF
    Surdam, J
    Orinion, E
    SlominskiCaster, S
    Watson, P
    Lerman, C
    Tonin, P
    Lenoir, G
    Serova, O
    Narod, S
    CANCER, 1997, 79 (11) : 2219 - 2228