Evolution and Revolution in Artificial Intelligence in Education

被引：293

作者：

Roll I. ^{[1
]}

Wylie R. ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC

[2] Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ

来源：

International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education | 2016年 / 26卷 / 02期

关键词：

Artificial intelligence in education; Education revolution; Intelligent tutoring systems; Interactive learning environments;

D O I：

10.1007/s40593-016-0110-3

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

The field of Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED) has undergone significant developments over the last twenty-five years. As we reflect on our past and shape our future, we ask two main questions: What are our major strengths? And, what new opportunities lay on the horizon? We analyse 47 papers from three years in the history of the Journal of AIED (1994, 2004, and 2014) to identify the foci and typical scenarios that occupy the field of AIED. We use those results to suggest two parallel strands of research that need to take place in order to impact education in the next 25 years: One is an evolutionary process, focusing on current classroom practices, collaborating with teachers, and diversifying technologies and domains. The other is a revolutionary process where we argue for embedding our technologies within students' everyday lives, supporting their cultures, practices, goals, and communities. © 2016 International Artificial Intelligence in Education Society.

引用

页码：582 / 599

页数：17

共 82 条

[1]

Adamson D., Dyke G., Jang H., Rose C.P., Towards an agile approach to adapting dynamic collaboration support to student needs, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 24, 1, pp. 92-124, (2014)

[2]

Ainsworth S., Grimshaw S., Evaluating the REDEEM authoring tool: Can teachers create effective learning environments?, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 14, 3, pp. 279-312, (2004)

[3]

Arroyo I., Woolf B.P., Burelson W., Muldner K., Rai D., Tai M., A multimedia Adaptive tutoring system for mathematics that addresses cognition, metacognition and affect, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 24, 4, pp. 387-426, (2014)

[4]

Baker M., A Model for Negotiation in Teaching-learning Dialogues, (1994)

[5]

Baker R.S.J.D., Corbett A.T., Koedinger K.R., Evenson S.E., Roll I., Wagner A.Z., Naim M., Raspat J., Baker D.J., Beck J., Adapting to When Students Game an Intelligent Tutoring System, Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, pp. 392-401, (2006)

[6]

Baker R.S.J.D., De Carvalho A.M.J.A., Raspat J., Aleven V., Corbett A.T., Koedinger K.R., Educational Software Features that Encourage and Discourage »gaming the System», Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp. 475-482, (2009)

[7]

Bertels K., A Dynamic View on Cognitive Student Modeling in Computer Programming, (1994)

[8]

Blandford A.E., Teaching Through Collaborative Problem Solving, (1994)

[9]

Bos E., Van De Plassche J., A Knowledge-based, (1994)

[10]

Britt M.A., Wiemer-Hastings P., Larson A.A., Perfetti C.A., Using intelligent feedback to improve sourcing and integration in students' essays, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 14, 3, pp. 359-374, (2004)

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 →