Adjunctive Risperidone for Partially Responsive People with Schizophrenia Treated with Clozapine

被引:0
作者
Elaine Weiner
Robert R Conley
M Patricia Ball
Stephanie Feldman
James M Gold
Deanna L Kelly
Ikwunga Wonodi
Robert P McMahon
Robert W Buchanan
机构
[1] Maryland Psychiatric Research Center,Department of Psychiatry
[2] University of Maryland School of Medicine,undefined
[3] Baltimore,undefined
[4] MD,undefined
[5] USA,undefined
[6] Eli Lilly and Company,undefined
[7] Lilly Bio-Medicines,undefined
[8] Neuroscience,undefined
来源
Neuropsychopharmacology | 2010年 / 35卷
关键词
schizophrenia; risperidone; clozapine; treatment resistant; positive symptoms; negative symptoms;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The large numbers of partial clozapine responders represent a major therapeutic challenge. Unfortunately, there are no clear data to support how best to treat these patients. This study examines the efficacy and safety of adjunctive risperidone in a well-defined treatment-resistant population optimally treated with clozapine. A total of 69 inpatients and outpatients with DSM-IV schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder entered a 16-week double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial. Of them, 33 participants were randomized to risperidone and 36 were randomized to placebo. There was no significant group difference in the predefined response criteria. There were modest group differences for Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) positive symptoms, which were significant in the completer analysis (F=5.70; df=1, 70.3; p=0.02; ES=0.27) but not the intent-to-treat (ITT) analyses (F=3.01; df=1, 77.5; p=0.09; ES=0.19). A similar pattern was found for the BPRS total score, with the completer analysis showing a significant improvement in the risperidone group (F=5.21; df=1, 64.9; p=0.03; ES=0.27), whereas the ITT analysis was not significant (F=3.52; df=1, 71.3; p=0.06; ES=0.22). In addition, there was a small, but significant, group difference for negative symptoms, as measured by the SANS total score, which favored the risperidone group (F=5.67; df=1, 78.7; p=0.02; ES=0.24). There were no significant group differences on safety measures, including neuropsychological test and extrapyramidal symptom scores. A significant elevation of prolactin in the risperidone group was observed. The study results suggest that adjunctive risperidone may have a modest benefit for treatment-resistant clozapine patients. The study results are discussed in the context of previous double-blind studies of adjunctive risperidone. (clinicaltrials.gov, trial number: NCT00056498).
引用
收藏
页码:2274 / 2283
页数:9
相关论文
共 174 条
  • [1] Anil Yağcioğlu AE(2005)A double-blind controlled study of adjunctive treatment with risperidone in schizophrenic patients partially responsive to clozapine: efficacy and safety J Clin Psychopharmacol 66 63-72
  • [2] Kivircik Akdede BB(1993)Subjective response to neuroleptics in schizophrenia Schizophr Bull 19 609-618
  • [3] Turget TI(1989)A rating scale for drug-induced akathisia Br J Psychiatry 154 672-676
  • [4] Tümüklü M(2007)The Akt-GSK-3 signaling cascade in the actions of dopamine Trends Pharmacol Sci 28 166-172
  • [5] Yazici MK(1995)Controlling the false discovery rate: a new and powerful approach to multiple testing J R Stat Soc, Ser B 57 1289-1300
  • [6] Alptekin K(1991)The Hopkins verbal learning test: development of a new verbal memory test with six equivalent forms Clin Neuropsychol 5 125-142
  • [7] Awad AG(1998)Positive and negative symptom response to clozapine in schizophrenic patients with and without the deficit syndrome Am J Psychiatry 155 751-760
  • [8] Barnes TRE(2007)The cognitive and negative symptoms in schizophrenia trial (CONSIST): the efficacy of glutamatergic agents for negative symptoms and cognitive impairments Am J Psychiatry 164 1593-1602
  • [9] Beaulieu JM(2002)Induction of differential patterns of local cerebral glucose metabolism and immediate-early genes by acute clozapine and haloperidol Neuropharmacology 43 394-407
  • [10] Gainetdinov RR(1988)Locally most powerful tests for detecting treatment effects when only a subset of patients are expected to ‘respond’ to treatment Biometrics 44 189-196