Genetic analysis of involvement of ETR1 in plant response to salt and osmotic stress

被引:0
|
作者
Youning Wang
Tao Wang
Kexue Li
Xia Li
机构
[1] Chinese Academy of Sciences,State Key Laboratory of Plant Cell and Chromosome Engineering, Center of Agricultural Resources, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology
[2] Graduate University of Chinese Academy Sciences,undefined
来源
Plant Growth Regulation | 2008年 / 54卷
关键词
Abiotic stress; Adaptation; Ethylene signaling pathway; Ethylene Response 1 (ETR1);
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The involvement of ethylene and ethylene receptor Ethylene Response 1 (ETR1) in plant stress responses has been highlighted. However, the physiological processes involved remain unclear. In this study, we have investigated the physiological response of two alleles etr1-1 and etr1-7 mutants during germination and post-germination seedling development in response to salt and osmotic stress. The etr1-1 mutants showed increased sensitivity to osmotic (200 mM or higher mannitol) and salt stress (50 mM NaCl or higher) during germination and seedling development, whereas the etr1-7 mutants displayed enhanced tolerance to the severe stresses (500 mM mannitol or 200 mM NaCl). These results provide physiological and genetic evidence that ethylene receptor ETR1 modulates plant response to abiotic stress. Furthermore, the etr1-1 and etr1-7 mutants showed different responses to exogenous abscisic acid (ABA) inhibition. The etr1-1 mutants were more sensitive to ABA than the wild type during germination, and young seedling development. In sharp contrast, the etr1-7 mutants showed enhanced insensitivity to ABA treatment (>1 μM ABA) in post-germination development including root elongation and greening of cotyledons of the treated seedlings, although the germination was not greatly altered at the tested doses of ABA. The results suggest that ETR1-modulated stress response may mediate ABA.
引用
收藏
页码:261 / 269
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Arabidopsis ETR1 and ERS1 Differentially Repress the Ethylene Response in Combination with Other Ethylene Receptor Genes
    Liu, Qian
    Wen, Chi-Kuang
    PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 2012, 158 (03) : 1193 - 1207
  • [22] Osmoprotectants - A plant strategy in response to osmotic stress
    Franco, OL
    Melo, FR
    RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 2000, 47 (01) : 137 - 144
  • [23] Vasopressin response to osmotic and hemodynamic stress: Neurotransmitter involvement
    Sladek, CD
    STRESS-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON THE BIOLOGY OF STRESS, 2004, 7 (02): : 85 - 90
  • [24] Regulation of mRNA decay in plant responses to salt and osmotic stress
    Dorota Kawa
    Christa Testerink
    Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 2017, 74 : 1165 - 1176
  • [25] Regulation of mRNA decay in plant responses to salt and osmotic stress
    Kawa, Dorota
    Testerink, Christa
    CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR LIFE SCIENCES, 2017, 74 (07) : 1165 - 1176
  • [26] Molecular and genetic aspects of plant responses to osmotic stress
    Xiong, L
    Zhu, JK
    PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT, 2002, 25 (02): : 131 - 139
  • [27] RESPONSE OF RADIATA PINE TO SALT STRESS .1. WATER RELATIONS, OSMOTIC ADJUSTMENT AND SALT UPTAKE
    SANDS, R
    CLARKE, ARP
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1977, 4 (04): : 637 - 646
  • [28] Abnormalities in growth, development and physiological responses to biotic and abiotic stress in potato (Solanum tuberosum) transformed with Arabidopsis ETR1
    Haines, NM
    Shiel, PJ
    Fellman, JK
    Berger, PH
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE, 2003, 141 : 333 - 347
  • [29] Transcriptomic analysis of the succulent xerophyte Zygophyllum xanthoxylum in response to salt treatment and osmotic stress
    Qing Ma
    Ai-Ke Bao
    Wei-Wei Chai
    Wen-Ying Wang
    Jin-Lin Zhang
    Yi-Xiao Li
    Suo-Min Wang
    Plant and Soil, 2016, 402 : 343 - 361
  • [30] Transcriptomic analysis of the succulent xerophyte Zygophyllum xanthoxylum in response to salt treatment and osmotic stress
    Ma, Qing
    Bao, Ai-Ke
    Chai, Wei-Wei
    Wang, Wen-Ying
    Zhang, Jin-Lin
    Li, Yi-Xiao
    Wang, Suo-Min
    PLANT AND SOIL, 2016, 402 (1-2) : 343 - 361