Previous Exposure to THC Alters the Reinforcing Efficacy and Anxiety-Related Effects of Cocaine in Rats

被引:0
作者
Leigh V Panlilio
Marcello Solinas
Stephanie A Matthews
Steven R Goldberg
机构
[1] Preclinical Pharmacology Section,Department of Health and Human Services
[2] Behavioral Neuroscience Branch,undefined
[3] Intramural Research Program,undefined
[4] National Institute on Drug Abuse,undefined
[5] National Institutes of Health,undefined
[6] Laboratoire de Biologie et Physiologie Cellulaire,undefined
[7] CNRS 6187,undefined
[8] University of Poitiers,undefined
来源
Neuropsychopharmacology | 2007年 / 32卷
关键词
self-administration; gateway drug hypothesis; progressive-ratio schedule; open field; light–dark test; heroin;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The hypothesis that prior cannabis exposure increases the likelihood of becoming addicted to other drugs can be evaluated by giving rats a history of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) exposure, then allowing them to self-administer other drugs. In Experiment 1, THC pre-exposure did not alter the acquisition of cocaine self-administration or the amount of cocaine taken under a fixed-ratio 1 (FR1) schedule, with one response required for each injection. Under a progressive-ratio schedule, with the response requirement increasing exponentially with each injection, cocaine-seeking was significantly reduced in THC-exposed rats, suggesting that the regimen of THC exposure used in the present study caused cocaine to be devalued as a reinforcer. In contrast, in an earlier study that used the same regimen, a history of THC exposure did not alter the value of heroin as a reinforcer under the progressive-ratio schedule, but it increased heroin self-administration under the FR1 schedule. Experiment 2 examined how this regimen of THC pre-exposure alters the locomotor effects of cocaine and heroin. THC pre-exposure produced cross-tolerance to the motor-depressant effects of heroin; this may explain the shortened post-injection pauses exhibited by THC-exposed rats under FR1 heroin self-administration. When given cocaine, THC-exposed rats exhibited normal increases in locomotion, but they avoided the center of the open field, suggesting that this THC pre-exposure regimen enhances the anxiogenic effects of cocaine. This enhanced anxiogenic effect—which was verified in Experiment 3 using another model of anxiety, the light–dark test—may explain the reduced reinforcing value of cocaine observed in THC-exposed rats in Experiment 1.
引用
收藏
页码:646 / 657
页数:11
相关论文
共 261 条
  • [1] Amalric M(1985)Low doses of methylnaloxonium in the nucleus accumbens antagonize hyperactivity induced by heroin in the rat Pharmacol Biochem Behav 23 411-415
  • [2] Koob GF(2001)Cannabinoid effects on anxiety-related behaviours and hypothalamic neurotransmitters Pharmacol Biochem Behav 70 123-131
  • [3] Arevalo C(1998)Effects of pre-exposure and co-administration of the cannabinoid receptor agonist CP 55,940 on behavioral sensitization to cocaine Eur J Pharmacol 354 9-16
  • [4] de Miguel R(1997)A critique of fixed and progressive ratio schedules used to examine the neural substrates of drug reinforcement Pharmacol Biochem Behav 57 441-447
  • [5] Hernandez-Tristan R(1983)Specious causal attributions in the social sciences: the reformulated stepping-stone theory of heroin use as exemplar J Pers Soc Psychol 45 1289-1298
  • [6] Arnold JC(2002)Involvement of the opioid system in the anxiolytic-like effects induced by Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol Psychopharmacology 163 111-117
  • [7] Topple AN(2001)Behavioural sensitization after repeated exposure to Delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cross-sensitization with morphine Psychopharmacology 158 259-266
  • [8] Hunt GE(2003)SR141716A reduces the reinforcing properties of heroin but not heroin-induced increases in nucleus accumbens dopamine in rats Eur J Neurosci 18 3145-3149
  • [9] McGregor IS(2005)Evidence for Pavlovian conditioning of cocaine-induced responses linked to emotional behavioral effects Pharmacol Biochem Behav 80 123-134
  • [10] Arnold JM(2005)Acute and chronic cocaine behavioral effects in novel Behav Brain Res 158 321-330