Prosthetic Breast Implant Rupture: Imaging—Pictorial Essay

被引:0
作者
Giuseppe Colombo
Vittorio Ruvolo
Roberto Stifanese
Marco Perillo
Alessandro Garlaschi
机构
[1] Koru Day Clinic Center,Biochemistry Section, Department of Experimental Medicine (DI.ME.S.), Center of Excellence for Biomedical Research (C.E.B.R.)
[2] University of Genoa,U.O.S. of Senology
[3] S. Martino Hospital,undefined
来源
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | 2011年 / 35卷
关键词
Magnetic resonance imaging; Mammography; MRI signs; Sonography; Ultrasonography; Ultrasound;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In recent years, requests for breast implant surgery have occurred for several reasons. First, the number of diagnosed breast cancer cases has increased, and the number of reconstructive surgeries consequently has multiplied. Second, the number of patients who constantly try to achieve a better physical shape, corresponding in Western countries to the common image of prosperous and tonic breasts, has proliferated. These circumstances have led to an increasingly frequent need for more accurate and sophisticated imaging methods to study prosthetic breast implants and their integrity. Diagnostic imaging for the study of patients with suspected breast implant ruptures uses different techniques of radiologic investigation such as mammography and ultrasonography, even if the current gold standard is magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).This study aimed to draw attention to the main MRI signs capable of highlighting contractures or ruptures of the implants that are not always clinically detectable and thus to provide plastic surgeons with an adequate instrument for discerning any possible alterations in prosthetic implants. Furthermore, it was necessary to stress the importance of teamwork. In fact, proper cooperation and coordination between radiologists and dedicated plastic surgeons are fundamental for the proper management of patients and the complications they may experience.
引用
收藏
页码:891 / 900
页数:9
相关论文
共 154 条
[1]  
Eklund GW(1988)Improved imaging of the augmented breast AJR Am J Roentgenol 151 469-473
[2]  
Busby RC(2004)Effect of breast augmentation on the accuracy of mammography and cancer characteristics JAMA 291 442-450
[3]  
Miller SH(1994)Comparative silicone breast implant evaluation using mammography, sonography, and magnetic resonance imaging: Experience with 59 implants Plast Reconstr Surg 94 620-627
[4]  
Job JS(1995)Radiographic diagnosis of breast implant rupture: current status and comparison of techniques Plast Reconstr Surg 96 865-877
[5]  
Miglioretti DL(1986)Radiographic evidence of breast implant rupture Plast Reconstr Surg 78 673-675
[6]  
Rutter CM(1998)Imaging signs and radiologists’ jargon of ruptured breast implants Plast Reconstr Surg 102 1281-1289
[7]  
Geller BM(1999)Imaging spectrum of extracapsular silicone: correlation of US, MR imaging, mammographic, and histopathologic findings Radiographics 19 S39-S51
[8]  
Cutter G(2004)Evaluation of the rupture of silicone breast implants by mammography, ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in asymptomatic patients: correlation with surgical findings Sao Paulo Med J 122 41-47
[9]  
Barlow WE(1993)Silicone breast implants: US evaluation Radiology 189 95-98
[10]  
Rosenberg R(2005)McLaughlin JK: The diagnosis of silicone breast-implant rupture: clinical findings compared with findings at magnetic resonance imaging Ann Plast Surg 54 583-589