Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (t-DCS) of the Cerebellum on Pain Perception and Endogenous Pain Modulation: a Randomized, Monocentric, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Crossover Study

被引:0
|
作者
Regina Stacheneder
Laura Alt
Andreas Straube
Ruth Ruscheweyh
机构
[1] University Hospital Großhadern,Department of Neurology
[2] Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich,Department of Neurology
[3] University Hospital Mannheim,Department of Neurology
[4] Ulm University Hospital,Graduate School of Systemic Neurosciences
[5] Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich,Research Training Group 2175
[6] Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich,undefined
来源
The Cerebellum | 2023年 / 22卷
关键词
Cerebellum; Neuromodulation; t-DCS; Pain; Offset analgesia; Non-invasive brain stimulation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Accumulating evidence demonstrates a role of the cerebellum in nociception. Some studies suggest that this is mediated via endogenous pain modulation. Here, we used t-DCS to test the effects of modulation of cerebellar function on nociception and endogenous pain modulation. Anodal, cathodal, and sham cerebellar t-DCS were investigated in a cross-over design in 21 healthy subjects. The nociceptive flexor (RIII) reflex, conditioning pain modulation (CPM), and offset analgesia (OA) paradigms were used to assess endogenous pain modulation. Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) and pain ratings were used to assess supraspinal nociception and pain perception, respectively. No significant t-DCS effects were detected when including all t-DCS types and time points (baseline, 0, 30, 60 min post t-DCS) in the analysis. Exploratory analysis revealed an increased RIII reflex size immediately after cathodal t-DCS (compared to sham, P = 0.046, η2p = 0.184), in parallel with a trend for a decrease in electrical pain thresholds (P = 0.094, η2p = 0.134), and increased N120 SEP amplitudes 30 min after cathodal compared to anodal t-DCS (P = 0.007, η2p = 0.374). OA was increased after anodal compared to sham stimulation (P = 0.023, η2p = 0.232). Exploratory results suggested that cathodal (inhibitory) cerebellar t-DCS increased pain perception and reduced endogenous pain inhibition while anodal (excitatory) t-DCS increased endogenous pain inhibition. Results are principally compatible with activation of endogenous pain inhibition by cerebellar excitation. However, maybe due to limited t-DCS skull penetration, effects were small and unlikely to be clinically significant.
引用
收藏
页码:1234 / 1242
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Prefrontal Cortex Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Treatment in Alcohol Dependence Syndrome (PreCoTTA): Study Protocol for a Double-blind Randomized Sham-controlled Trial
    Deshmukh, Anagha S.
    Praharaj, Samir Kumar
    Rai, Shweta
    Kamath, Asha
    Upadhya, Dinesh
    REVIEWS ON RECENT CLINICAL TRIALS, 2021, 16 (04) : 409 - 420
  • [32] Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Improves Naming Reaction Time in Fluent Aphasia A Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Study
    Fridriksson, Julius
    Richardson, Jessica D.
    Baker, Julie M.
    Rorden, Chris
    STROKE, 2011, 42 (03) : 819 - 821
  • [33] Efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation for treating anhedonia in patients with depression: A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial
    Kong, Shuqi
    Chen, Yiming
    Huang, Haijing
    Yang, Weichieh
    Lyu, Dongbin
    Wang, Fan
    Huang, Qinte
    Zhang, Mengke
    Chen, Shentse
    Wei, Zheyi
    Shi, Shuxiang
    Fang, Yiru
    Hong, Wu
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2024, 350 : 264 - 273
  • [34] Effects of transcranial pulse stimulation on autism spectrum disorder: a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled trial
    Cheung, Teris
    Li, Tim Man Ho
    Lam, Joyce Yuen Ting
    Fong, Kwan Hin
    Chiu, Lok Yi
    Ho, Yuen Shan
    Tse, Andy Choi-Yeung
    Li, Cheng-Ta
    Cheng, Calvin Pak-Wing
    Beisteiner, Roland
    BRAIN COMMUNICATIONS, 2023, 5 (05)
  • [35] Mindfulness-Based Relapse Prevention and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Reduce Heavy Drinking: A Double-Blind Sham-Controlled Randomized Trial
    Witkiewitz, Katie
    Stein, Elena R.
    Votaw, Victoria R.
    Wilson, Adam D.
    Roos, Corey R.
    Gallegos, Stevi J.
    Clark, Vincent P.
    Claus, Eric D.
    ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2019, 43 (06) : 1296 - 1307
  • [36] Transcranial direct current stimulation is safe and effective in autoimmune myopathies: a randomised, double-blind, sham-controlled trial
    de Sousa, L. F. A.
    Misse, R. G.
    dos Santos, L. M.
    Tanaka, C.
    Greve, J. M. A.
    Baptista, A. F.
    Shinjo, S. K.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2023, 41 (02) : 221 - 229
  • [37] The effects of photobiomodulation and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on chronic neck pain: A double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled trial
    Rampazo, Erika P.
    de Andrade, Ana Laura M.
    da Silva, Viviane R.
    Back, Claudio G. N.
    Madeleine, Pascal
    Liebano, Richard E.
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2024, 28 (06)
  • [38] Analgesic effect of dual-target transcranial direct current stimulation on transient pain and sustained pain: A double-blind, randomized controlled study
    Qiu, Yi
    Chang, Xiang-Yu
    Tu, Yi-Heng
    ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA SINICA, 2024, 56 (10)
  • [39] Differential effects of primary motor cortex and cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation on motor learning in healthy individuals: A randomized double-blind sham-controlled study
    Ehsani, F.
    Bakhtiary, A. H.
    Jaberzadeh, S.
    Talimkhani, A.
    Hajihasani, A.
    NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH, 2016, 112 : 10 - 19
  • [40] Cathodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Occipital cortex in Episodic Migraine: A Randomized Sham-Controlled Crossover Study
    Ahdab, Rechdi
    Mansour, Anthony G.
    Khazen, Georges
    El-Khoury, Christelle
    Sabbouh, Toni M.
    Salem, Maher
    Yamak, Wissam
    Ayache, Samar S.
    Riachi, Naji
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (01)