Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (t-DCS) of the Cerebellum on Pain Perception and Endogenous Pain Modulation: a Randomized, Monocentric, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Crossover Study

被引:0
|
作者
Regina Stacheneder
Laura Alt
Andreas Straube
Ruth Ruscheweyh
机构
[1] University Hospital Großhadern,Department of Neurology
[2] Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich,Department of Neurology
[3] University Hospital Mannheim,Department of Neurology
[4] Ulm University Hospital,Graduate School of Systemic Neurosciences
[5] Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich,Research Training Group 2175
[6] Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich,undefined
来源
The Cerebellum | 2023年 / 22卷
关键词
Cerebellum; Neuromodulation; t-DCS; Pain; Offset analgesia; Non-invasive brain stimulation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Accumulating evidence demonstrates a role of the cerebellum in nociception. Some studies suggest that this is mediated via endogenous pain modulation. Here, we used t-DCS to test the effects of modulation of cerebellar function on nociception and endogenous pain modulation. Anodal, cathodal, and sham cerebellar t-DCS were investigated in a cross-over design in 21 healthy subjects. The nociceptive flexor (RIII) reflex, conditioning pain modulation (CPM), and offset analgesia (OA) paradigms were used to assess endogenous pain modulation. Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) and pain ratings were used to assess supraspinal nociception and pain perception, respectively. No significant t-DCS effects were detected when including all t-DCS types and time points (baseline, 0, 30, 60 min post t-DCS) in the analysis. Exploratory analysis revealed an increased RIII reflex size immediately after cathodal t-DCS (compared to sham, P = 0.046, η2p = 0.184), in parallel with a trend for a decrease in electrical pain thresholds (P = 0.094, η2p = 0.134), and increased N120 SEP amplitudes 30 min after cathodal compared to anodal t-DCS (P = 0.007, η2p = 0.374). OA was increased after anodal compared to sham stimulation (P = 0.023, η2p = 0.232). Exploratory results suggested that cathodal (inhibitory) cerebellar t-DCS increased pain perception and reduced endogenous pain inhibition while anodal (excitatory) t-DCS increased endogenous pain inhibition. Results are principally compatible with activation of endogenous pain inhibition by cerebellar excitation. However, maybe due to limited t-DCS skull penetration, effects were small and unlikely to be clinically significant.
引用
收藏
页码:1234 / 1242
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (t-DCS) of the Cerebellum on Pain Perception and Endogenous Pain Modulation: a Randomized, Monocentric, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Crossover Study
    Stacheneder, Regina
    Alt, Laura
    Straube, Andreas
    Ruscheweyh, Ruth
    CEREBELLUM, 2023, 22 (06): : 1234 - 1242
  • [2] Randomized, crossover, sham-controlled, double-blind study of transcranial direct current stimulation of left DLPFC on executive functions
    Dumont, Laurence
    El Mouderrib, Sofia
    Theoret, Hugo
    RESTORATIVE NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2018, 36 (06) : 755 - 766
  • [3] Modulation of central pain mechanisms using high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation: A double-blind, sham-controlled study
    Kold, Sebastian
    Graven-Nielsen, Thomas
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2023, 27 (02) : 303 - 315
  • [4] Efficacy of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in Somatic Symptom Disorder, Predominantly Pain: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Study
    Peethala, Prashanth
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2016, 58 (05) : S79 - S79
  • [5] Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Pain and Physical Functions in Individuals with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Double-Blind Randomized Sham-controlled Study
    Is, Enes Efe
    Aksu, Serkan
    Karamursel, Sacit
    Ketenci, Aysegul
    Sindel, Dilsad
    ACTA PHYSIOLOGICA, 2023, 237 : 63 - 63
  • [6] Impact of Bifrontal Home-Based Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Pain Catastrophizing and Disability due to Pain in Fibromyalgia: A Randomized, Double-Blind Sham-Controlled Study
    Caumo, Wolnei
    Alves, Rael Lopes
    Vicuna, Paul
    da Silveira Alves, Camila Fernanda
    Ramalho, Leticia
    Sanches, Paulo R. S.
    Silva, Danton P.
    da Silva Torres, Iraci Lucena
    Fregni, Felipe
    JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2022, 23 (04): : 641 - 656
  • [7] Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Children with Developmental Coordination Disorder: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Pilot Study
    Akremi, Haifa
    Hamel, Raphael
    Dumas, Anne
    Camden, Chantal
    Corriveau, Helene
    Lepage, Jean-Francois
    JOURNAL OF AUTISM AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS, 2022, 52 (07) : 3202 - 3213
  • [8] Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in the Cerebellar Cognitive Affective Syndrome: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial
    Reumers, Stacha F. I.
    Maas, Roderick P. P. W. M.
    Schutter, Dennis J. L. G.
    Teerenstra, Steven
    Kessels, Roy P. C.
    de Leeuw, Frank-Erik
    van de Warrenburg, Bart P. C.
    MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 2025, 40 (01) : 121 - 131
  • [9] Effects of Bihemispheric Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Upper Extremity Function in Stroke Patients: A randomized Double-Blind Sham-Controlled Study
    Alisar, Dilek Cetinkaya
    Ozen, Selin
    Sozay, Seyhan
    JOURNAL OF STROKE & CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2020, 29 (01):
  • [10] Transcranial direct current stimulation for upper limb neuropathic pain: A double-blind randomized controlled trial
    Lewis, G. N.
    Rice, D. A.
    Kluger, M.
    McNair, P. J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2018, 22 (07) : 1312 - 1320