Evaluation of AMSTAR to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews in overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions

被引:0
作者
Michelle Pollock
Ricardo M. Fernandes
Lisa Hartling
机构
[1] University of Alberta,Alberta Research Centre for Health Evidence, Department of Pediatrics
[2] University of Lisbon,Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Instituto de Medicina Molecular
[3] Santa Maria Hospital,Department of Pediatrics
来源
BMC Medical Research Methodology | / 17卷
关键词
Systematic review; Overview of reviews; Knowledge synthesis; Methodological quality; Observer agreement; Bias;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 279 条
[1]  
Bastian H(2010)Seventy-five trials and eleven systematic reviews a day: how will we ever keep up? PLoS Med 7 1267-73
[2]  
Glasziou P(2012)A descriptive analysis of overviews of reviews published between 2000 and 2011 PLoS One 7 166-73
[3]  
Chalmers I(2012)Overviews of reviews often have limited rigor: a systematic review J Clin Epidemiol 65 190-8
[4]  
Hartling L(2012)Quality and transparency of overviews of systematic reviews J Evid Based Med 5 244-53
[5]  
Chisholm A(2016)What guidance is available for researchers conducting overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions? A scoping review and qualitative metasummary Syst Rev 5 648-18
[6]  
Thomson D(2016)Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews of biomedical research: a cross-sectional study PLoS Med 13 909-57
[7]  
Dryden DM(2013)Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews in leading orthodontic journals: a quality paradigm? Eur J Orthodont 35 245-1014
[8]  
Pieper D(2010)Adult urology: assessment of the methodological quality of systematic reviews published in the urological literature from 1998 to 2008 J Urol 184 997-61
[9]  
Buechter R(2015)Preventing child and adolescent anxiety disorders: overview of systematic reviews Depress Anxiety 32 52-20
[10]  
Jerinic P(2015)A youth suicide prevention plan for Canada: a systematic review of reviews Can J Psychiatry 60 26-402