High-risk HPV type-specific clearance rates in cervical screening

被引:0
作者
N W J Bulkmans
J Berkhof
S Bulk
M C G Bleeker
F J van Kemenade
L Rozendaal
P J F Snijders
C J L M Meijer
机构
[1] VU University Medical Center,Department of Pathology
[2] VU University Medical Center,Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics
来源
British Journal of Cancer | 2007年 / 96卷
关键词
human papillomavirus; clearance; type; cervical screening; cervical intraepithelial neoplasia;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We assessed clearance rates of 14 high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) types in hrHPV-positive women with normal cytology and borderline/mild dyskaryosis (BMD) in a population-based cervical screening cohort of 44 102 women. The 6-month hrHPV type-specific clearance rates, that is, clearance of the same type as detected at baseline, in women with normal and BMD smears were 43% (95% confidence interval (CI) 39–47) and 29% (95% CI 24–34), respectively. Corresponding 18-month clearance rates were markedly higher, namely 65% (95% CI 60–69) and 41% (95% CI 36–47), respectively. The lowest clearance rates in women with normal cytology were observed for HPV16, HPV18, HPV31, and HPV33. Significantly reduced 18-month clearance rates at a significance level of 1% were observed for HPV16 (49%, 95% CI 41–59) and HPV31 (50%, 95% CI 39–63) in women with normal cytology, and for HPV16 (19%, 95% CI 12–29) in women with BMD. Among women who did not clear hrHPV, women with HPV16 persistence displayed an increased detection rate of ⩾CIN3 (normal P<0.0001; BMD, P=0.005). The type-specific differences in clearance rates indicate the potential value of hrHPV genotyping in screening programs. Our data support close surveillance (i.e. referral directly, or within 6 months) of women with HPV16 and are inconclusive for surveillance of women with HPV18, HPV31, and HPV33. For the other hrHPV-positive women, it seems advisable to adopt a conservative management with a long waiting period, as hrHPV clearance is markedly higher after 18 months than after 6 months and the risk for ⩾CIN3 is low.
引用
收藏
页码:1419 / 1424
页数:5
相关论文
共 166 条
[1]  
An HJ(2003)Correlation of cervical carcinoma and precancerous lesions with human papillomavirus (HPV) genotypes detected with the HPV DNA chip microarray method Cancer 97 1672-1680
[2]  
Cho NH(2006)Human papillomavirus type-specific 18-month risk of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in women with a normal or borderline/mildly dyskaryotic smear Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15 1268-1273
[3]  
Lee SY(2002)The causal relation between human papillomavirus and cervical cancer J Clin Pathol 55 244-265
[4]  
Kim IH(2004)The Dutch CISOE-A framework for cytology reporting increases efficacy of screening upon standardisation since 1996 J Clin Pathol 57 388-393
[5]  
Lee C(2005)Prevalence of types 16 and 33 is increased in high-risk human papillomavirus positive women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse Int J Cancer 117 177-181
[6]  
Kim SJ(2004)POBASCAM, a population-based randomised controlled trial for implementation of high-risk HPV testing in cervical screening Int J Cancer 110 94-101
[7]  
Mun MS(2005)Human papillomavirus type 16 infections and 2-year absolute risk of cervical precancer in women with equivocal or mild cytologic abnormalities J Natl Cancer Inst 97 1066-1071
[8]  
Kim SH(2001)Human papillomavirus testing in primary screening for the detection of high-grade cervical lesions: a study of 7932 women Br J Cancer 84 1616-1623
[9]  
Jeong JK(2006)Overview of the European and North American studies on HPV testing in primary cervical cancer screening Int J Cancer 119 1095-1101
[10]  
Berkhof J(2003)Management of women who test positive for high-risk types of human papillomavirus: the HART study Lancet 362 1871-1876