Unascertained Measure-Set Pair Analysis Model of Collapse Risk Evaluation in Mountain Tunnels and Its Engineering Application

被引:0
作者
Wu Chen
Guohua Zhang
Yuyong Jiao
Hao Wang
机构
[1] Chinese Academy of Sciences,State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics
[2] University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Faculty of Engineering
[3] China University of Geosciences,undefined
来源
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering | 2021年 / 25卷
关键词
Mountain tunnel; Risk evaluation; Rough set; Unascertained measure theory; Set pair analysis; Connection degree;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Collapse is a major geological disaster that occurs during mountain tunnel construction. However, the accuracy of collapse risk assessment is generally restricted by evaluation factors or methods. This paper proposes a novel integrated collapse risk evaluation method for mountain tunnels based on case-based reasoning, rough set theory, and unascertained measure-set pair analysis (UM-SPA) theory. First, the risk surroundings and risk factors involved in tunnel collapse are summarized by the analytic hierarchy process, and a preliminary risk evaluation index system is established. Then, an attribute reduction algorithm based on the conditional information entropy of a rough set is proposed and applied to cases with similar attribute characteristics as those of the tunnel to be evaluated, to remove the relatively insignificant or redundant indices and improve the reliability of risk assessment. Finally, taking the relationship between tunnel collapse and its evaluation indices as an unascertained system, Set Pair Analysis (SPA) theory is introduced to optimize the credible degree recognition criteria of unascertained measure theory (UMT). Combined with the modified entropy weight method, a UM-SPA model for tunnel collapse risk evaluation is established to calculate the level of collapse risk quantitatively and predict the development trend of risk dynamically. Taking Xiucun Tunnel passing through fault F18 as an example, collapse risk is evaluated and compared with the evaluation results of traditional UMT and field status. The results demonstrate the feasibility and efficiency of the proposed approach and provide a new idea for collapse risk prediction while constructing mountain tunnels.
引用
收藏
页码:451 / 467
页数:16
相关论文
共 154 条
[1]  
Alimoradi A(2008)Prediction of geological hazardous zones in front of a tunnel face using TSP-203 and artificial neural networks Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 23 711-717
[2]  
Moradzadeh A(2010)Artificial neural network application for the prediction of ground surface movements induced by shield tunnelling Canadian Geotechnical Journal 47 1214-1233
[3]  
Naderi R(2015)Application of the improved analytic hierarchy process in the risk management of tunnel construction Applied Mechanics and Materials 696 295-300
[4]  
Salehi MZ(2020)Evaluation of tunnel collapse susceptibility based on T-S fuzzy fault tree and Bayesian network Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University 54 820-830
[5]  
Etemadi A(2019)Risk assessment of mountain tunnel collapse based on rough set and conditional information entropy Rock and Soil Mechanics 40 3549-3558
[6]  
Boubou R(2019)Evaluation of possibility of tunnel collapse by drilling and blasting method based on T-S fuzzy fault tree Rock and Soil Mechanics 40 319-328
[7]  
Emeriault F(2009)Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process for risk evaluation of collapse during construction of mountain tunnel Rock and Soil Mechanics 30 2365-2370
[8]  
Kastner R(2006)An analytic hierarchy process based model for risk and opportunity assessment of international construction projects Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 33 58-68
[9]  
Chen XX(2004)Guidelines for tunnelling risk management: International tunnelling association, working group No. 2 Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 19 217-237
[10]  
Chen RH(2012)Handling and updating uncertain information in bow-tie analysis Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 25 8-19