Gender Roles and Stereotypes about Science Careers Help Explain Women and Men’s Science Pursuits

被引:0
作者
Jane G. Stout
Victoria A. Grunberg
Tiffany A. Ito
机构
[1] Computing Research Association,Department of Psychology
[2] Drexel University,Department of Psychology and Neuroscience
[3] University of Colorado Boulder,undefined
来源
Sex Roles | 2016年 / 75卷
关键词
Gender; Gender roles; Occupational choice; Science; STEM;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Diverse perspectives in science promote innovation and creativity, and represent the needs of a diverse populace. However, many science fields lack gender diversity. Although fewer women than men pursue careers in physical science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (pSTEM), more women than men pursue careers in behavioral science. The current work measured the relationship between first-year college students’ stereotypes about science professions and course completion in science fields over the next 3 years. pSTEM careers were more associated with self-direction and self-promotion (i.e., agency) than with working with and for the betterment of others (i.e., communion). On the flip side, behavioral science careers were associated with communion to a greater degree than with agency. Women completed a lower proportion of pSTEM courses than did men, but this gender disparity disappeared when women perceived high opportunity for communion in pSTEM. Men pursued behavioral science courses to a lesser degree than did women; this disparity did not exist when men perceived ample opportunity for agency in behavioral science. These results suggest highlighting the communal nature of pSTEM and the agentic nature of behavioral science in pre-college settings may promote greater gender diversity across science fields.
引用
收藏
页码:490 / 499
页数:9
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]  
Abele AE(2007)Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 93 751-763
[2]  
Wojciszke B(2012)Computing, we have a problem ACM Inroads 3 34-40
[3]  
Camp T(2011)Understanding current causes of women’s underrepresentation in science Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108 3157-3162
[4]  
Ceci SJ(2009)Women’s underrepresentation in science: Sociocultural and biological considerations Psychological Bulletin 135 218-261
[5]  
Williams WM(1999)Gender-stereotypic images of occupations correspond to the sex segregation of employment Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 25 413-423
[6]  
Ceci SJ(2009)Ambient belonging: How stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 97 1045-1060
[7]  
Williams WM(2013)The stereotypical computer scientist: Gendered media representations as a barrier to inclusion for women Sex Roles 69 58-71
[8]  
Barnett SM(2015)An under-examined inequality: Cultural and psychological barriers to men’s engagement with communal roles Personality and Social Psychology Review 19 343-370
[9]  
Cejka MA(2014)Girls and women in science, technology, engineering and mathematics: STEMing the tide and broadening participation in STEM careers Policy Insights from Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1 21-29
[10]  
Eagly AH(2010)Seeking congruity between goals and roles: A new look at why women opt out of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics careers Psychological Science 21 1051-1057