Individual differences in working memory capacity and divided attention in dichotic listening

被引:0
作者
Gregory J. H. Colflesh
Andrew R. A. Conway
机构
[1] University of Illinois,Department of Psychology (M/C 285)
[2] Princeton University,undefined
来源
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review | 2007年 / 14卷
关键词
Work Memory Capacity; Dichotic Listening; Antisaccade Task; Divided Attention Task; High Work Memory Capacity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The controlled attention theory of working memory suggests that individuals with greater working memory capacity (WMC) are better able to control or focus their attention than individuals with lesser WMC. This relationship has been observed in a number of selective attention paradigms including a dichotic listening task (Conway, Cowan, & Bunting, 2001) in which participants were required to shadow words presented to one ear and ignore words presented to the other ear. Conway et al. found that when the participant’s name was presented to the ignored ear, 65% of participants with low WMC reported hearing their name, compared to only 20% of participants with high WMC, suggesting greater selective attention on the part of high WMC participants. In the present study, individual differences in divided attention were examined in a dichotic listening task, in which participants shadowed one message and listened for their own name in the other message. Here we find that 66.7% of high WMC and 34.5% of low WMC participants detected their name. These results suggest that as WMC capacity increases, so does the ability to control the focus of attention, with high WMC participants being able to flexibly “zoom in” or “zoom out” depending on task demands.
引用
收藏
页码:699 / 703
页数:4
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
Bleckley M. K.(2003)Individual differences in working memory capacity predict visual attention allocation Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 10 884-889
[2]  
Durso F. T.(2001)The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: The importance of working memory capacity Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 8 331-335
[3]  
Crutchfield J. M.(2005)Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 12 769-786
[4]  
Engle R. W.(2001)A controlled-attention view of working memory capacity: Individual differences in memory span and the control of visual orienting Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 130 169-183
[5]  
Khanna M. M.(2002)The role of prefrontal cortex in working-memory capacity, executive attention, and general fluid intelligence: An individual differences perspective Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 9 637-671
[6]  
Conway A. R. A.(2003)Working memory capacity and the control of attention: The contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 132 47-70
[7]  
Cowan N.(2004)The generality of working memory capacity: A latent variable approach to verbal and visuospatial memory span and reasoning Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 133 189-217
[8]  
Bunting M. F.(1959)Attention in dichotic listening: Affective cues and the influence of instructions Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 11 56-60
[9]  
Conway A. R. A.(2004)Working memory capacity and the antisaccade task: Individual differences in voluntary saccade control Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 30 1302-1321
[10]  
Kane M. J.(1995)The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: How frequent are attention shifts to one’s name in an irrelevant auditory channel? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 21 255-260