The Role of the Food and Drug Administration in Pharmacoeconomic Evaluation During the Drug Development Process

被引:0
作者
Jennifer Kim
Carolyn Blank Morris
Kevin Alan Schulman
机构
[1] Georgetown University Medical Center,Clinical Economics Research Unit
[2] Duke University Medical Center,Center for Clinical and Genetic Economics, Duke Clinical Research Institute
来源
Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association | 2000年 / 34卷 / 4期
关键词
Clinical economics; Cost-effectiveness analysis; Food and Drug Administration;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Economic analysis is increasingly being integrated into Phase III clinical trials. In 1995, the Clinical Economics Research Unit of Georgetown University Medical Center implemented a survey to assess the use of pharmacoeconomic data in the clinical development process. This survey gathered information regarding the companies’ use of economic analyses in the drug approval process and the analyses commented upon by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in its review (17). The results from the 1995 survey found that companies reported that pharmacoeconomic data were increasingly being submitted to the FDA in product approval packages, and that the FDA increasingly commented on these data. Given the growth of interest in economic evaluation since 1995, the survey was re-implemented in 1998 to examine the current state of the art in economic evaluation. The results indicate continuing and expanding interest in submitting pharmacoeconomic data to the FDA during the drug development process and reports of recent approval of economic claims in product labeling.
引用
收藏
页码:1207 / 1213
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Schulman KA(1996)Economic assessment within the clinical development program Med Care 34 DS89-DS95
[2]  
Liana T(1996)Economic evaluation of the FIRST study: Design of a prospective analysis alongside a multinational phase III clinical trial Control Clin Trials 17 304-315
[3]  
Yabroff KR(1996)Results of the economic evaluation of the FIRST study: A multinational prospective economic evaluation Intl J Tech Assess Health Care 12 698-713
[4]  
Schulman KA(1992)How attractive does a new technology have to be to warrant adoption and utilization? Tentative guidelines for using clinical and economic evaluations Can Med Assoc J 146 473-481
[5]  
Schulpher M(1993)Guidelines for economic analysis of pharmaceutical products: A draft document for Ontario and Canada Pharmacoeconomics 3 354-361
[6]  
Glick H(1997)Design of the cardiac insufficiency bisoprolol study II (OBIS II) Fundamen Clin Pharmacol 11 138-142
[7]  
Backhouse M(1997)Randomised trial of losartan versus capto-pril in patients over 65 with heart failure (Evaluation of Losartan in the Elderly Study, ELITE) Lancet 349 747-752
[8]  
Buxton K G H(1994)Effect of aerosolized recombinant human DNase on exacerbations of respiratory symptoms and on pulmonary function in patients with cystic fibrosis New Eng J Med 331 637-642
[9]  
Schulman M(1995)The emerging role of the Food and Drug Administration in pharmacoeconomic evaluation during the drug development process Drug Inf J 29 1105-1111
[10]  
Buxton M(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined