Impact of tumor cellularity on the HER2 amplification assay by OncoScan™ in breast cancer

被引:0
作者
Ako Ohara
Yasuto Naoi
Masafumi Shimoda
Tomonori Tanei
Naofumi Kagara
Tomohiro Miyake
Yoshiaki Sota
Seung Jin Kim
Kenzo Shimazu
Shinzaburo Noguchi
机构
[1] Osaka University Graduate,Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, School of Medicine
来源
Breast Cancer | 2021年 / 28卷
关键词
Breast cancer; HER2 amplification; OncoScan™; Microarray; Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sample;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
HER2 amplification is seen in 20–25% of primary breast cancer cases, and HER2 detection is performed routinely in primary operable, as well as metastatic breast cancer patients. Currently, HER2 is the only gene of which amplification is routinely assayed by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and/or immunohistochemistry (IHC). However, histochemical assay (FISH/IHC) of multiple target genes is laborious and time-consuming, and simultaneous amplification by microarray is preferred. OncoScan™ is a microarray-based assay capable of whole-genome copy number analysis using DNA extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues. In the current study, we aimed to investigate the impact of tumor cellularity on the accuracy of OncoScan™ in the determination of HER2 amplification. Our results demonstrated that HER2 amplification by OncoScan™ is accurate, and has a high concordance rate of 93.3% with FISH. However, the concordance rate is poor (66.7%) in cases with a tumor cellularity < 20%. Nevertheless, the addition of FISH to breast tumors with a tumor cellularity < 20% and a HER2 copy number of 4 appears to be useful to minimize false-negative results by OncoScan™.
引用
收藏
页码:977 / 982
页数:5
相关论文
共 102 条
  • [1] Slamon DJ(1987)Human breast cancer: correlation of relapse and survival with amplification of the HER2/neu oncogene Science 235 177-182
  • [2] Clark GM(2011)Target therapy in HER2—overexpressing breast cancer patients OMICS 15 363-367
  • [3] Wong SG(2012)Pertuzumab plus trastuzumab plus docetaxel for metastatic breast cancer N Engl J Med 366 109-119
  • [4] Levin WJ(2013)Pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (CLEOPATRA study): overall survival results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study Lancet Oncol 14 461-471
  • [5] Ullrich A(2015)Pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer N Engl J Med 372 724-734
  • [6] McGuire WL(2012)Trastuzumabemtansine for HER2-positive advanced breast cancer N Engl J Med 367 1783-1791
  • [7] Amodio R(2017)Trastuzumabemtansine versus capecitabine plus lapatinib in patients with previously treated HER2-positive advanced breast cancer (EMILIA): a descriptive analysis of final overall survival results from a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial Lancet Oncol 18 732-742
  • [8] Zarcone M(2014)Patient-reported outcomes from EMILIA, a randomized phase 3 study of trastuzumabemtansine (T-DM1) versus capecitabine and lapatinib in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer Cancer 120 642-651
  • [9] Cusimano R(2006)Lapatinib plus capecitabine for HER2-positive advanced breast cancer N Engl J Med 355 2733-2743
  • [10] Campisi I(2008)A phase III randomized comparison of lapatinib plus capecitabine versus capecitabine alone in women with advanced breast cancer that has progressed on trastuzumab: updated efficacy and biomarker analyses Breast Cancer Res Treat 112 533-543