共 71 条
[1]
Wilkins MF(2017)Lifetime risk of surgery for stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse Minerva Ginecol 69 171-177
[2]
Wu JM(2018)What impacts the all cause risk of reoperation after pelvic organ prolapse repair? A comparison of mesh and native tissue approaches in 110,329 women J Urol 3 42415-42419
[3]
Dallas KB(2013)Long-term outcomes of vaginal mesh versus native tissue repair for anterior vaginal wall prolapse Int Urogynecol J 24 1279-1285
[4]
Rogo-Gupta L(2017)Risk factors for recurrence after hysterectomy plus native-tissue repair as primary treatment for genital prolapse Int Urogynecol J 29 1-7
[5]
Elliott CS(2012)International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint terminology and classification of the complications related to native tissue female pelvic floor surgery Neurourol Urodyn 31 406-414
[6]
Jonsson Funk M(2010)Obliterative procedures for pelvic organ prolapse Clin Obstet Gynecol 53 86-98
[7]
Visco AG(2008)Transobturator slings for stress incontinence: using urodynamic parameters to predict outcomes Int Urogynecol J 19 97-102
[8]
Weidner AC(2005)Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7) Am J Obstetr Gynecol 193 103-528
[9]
Pate V(2010)Validation of the patient global impression of improvement (PGI-I) for urogenital prolapse Int Urogynecol J 21 523-5
[10]
Wu JM(2014)Systematic assessment of surgical complications in 438 cases of vaginal native tissue repair for pelvic organ prolapse adopting Clavien-Dindo classification Arch Gynecol Obstetr 291 1-374