Mansoura University habilitation outcome of prelingual cochlear-implanted children: 5 years of experience

被引:0
作者
Abou-Elsaad T. [1 ]
Baz H. [1 ]
Allatif G.A. [1 ]
Afsah O. [1 ]
Amer A. [1 ]
Marzouk N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Phoniatric Unit, ORL Department, Department of ENT, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura
关键词
auditory skills; children disability; cochlear implant; hearing impairment; language therapy;
D O I
10.4103/1012-5574.186536
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Abstract Introduction: The aim of this study was to explore the effects of different preimplantation and postimplantation factors on the postimplant outcome of prelingual cochlear-implanted (CI) children as regards their auditory and language development. Patients and methods: This retrospective study included a sample of 33 prelingual CI children who were presented to the Phoniatric Unit, Mansoura University Hospitals, Mansoura, Egypt, and were implanted during the last 5 years starting from August 2009 to August 2014. All children received structured auditory and language therapy sessions after CI twice weekly. They were subjected to the protocol of assessment of a delayed language development (before and after language therapy sessions) using subjective and quasiobjective measures of evaluation including improvement quotient assessment, language assessment, and assessment of auditory abilities including detection, discrimination, identification, and comprehension. Results: The results of the study proved that the better habilitation outcomes after CI children are correlated with young age at CI surgery, preoperative improvement quotient, language therapy before and after implantation, and regularity of hearing aids usage before surgery. Conclusion: Early CI of the prelingual children is recommended to minimize initial language delays and to promote the development of age-appropriate communication skills. © 2016, The Author(s).
引用
收藏
页码:222 / 228
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
Stevens G., Flaxman S., Brunskill E., Mascarenhas M., Mathers C.D., Finucane M., Global and regional hearing impairment prevalence: an analysis of 42 studies in 29 countries, Eur J Public Health, 23, pp. 146-152, (2011)
[2]  
Bradham T., Jones J., Cochlear implant candidacy in the United States: prevalence in children 12 months to 6 years of age, Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 72, pp. 1023-1028, (2008)
[3]  
Mudry A., Mills M., The early history of the cochlear implant: a retrospective, JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 139, pp. 446-453, (2013)
[4]  
Manrique M., Cervera-Paz F.J., Huarte A., Perez N., Molina M., Garcia-Tapia R., Cerebral auditory plasticity and cochlear implants, Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 49, pp. S193-S197, (2001)
[5]  
Kameswaran M., Natarajan K., Basheth N., Clinical audit of outcomes in cochlear implantation an Indian experience, Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 58, pp. 69-73, (2006)
[6]  
Cosetti M.K., Waltzman S.B., Lin Frank R., Outcomes in cochlear implantation: variables affecting performance in adults and children, Otolaryngol Clin North Am, 45, pp. 155-171, (2012)
[7]  
Zwolan Teresa A., Thomas E., Cohen N., Perspectives on hearing and hearing disorder in childhood, ASHA, 19, pp. 4-5, (2010)
[8]  
Melika L., Stanford Binet Intelligence Scale (4th Arabic version), (1998)
[9]  
Snijder M.L., Oomen S., Non-verbal intelligence for deaf and hearing Subjects, (1939)
[10]  
Caldwell A., Nittrouer S., Speech perception in noise by children with cochlear implants, J Speech Lang Hear Res, 56, pp. 13-30, (2013)