Decision Making Through Dialogue: a Case Study of Analyzing Preservice Teachers’ Argumentation on Socioscientific Issues

被引:0
作者
Mijung Kim
Robert Anthony
David Blades
机构
[1] University of Victoria,Department of Curriculum and Instruction
来源
Research in Science Education | 2014年 / 44卷
关键词
Dialogical argumentation; Preservice teachers; Socioscientific issues;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
引用
收藏
页码:903 / 926
页数:23
相关论文
共 61 条
  • [11] Simon S(2004)Prospects for transdisciplinarity Futures 36 515-526
  • [12] Osborne J(1993)Science as argument: implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking Science Education 77 319-337
  • [13] Godemann J(2013)What students’ arguments can tell us: using argumentation schemes in science education Argumentation 27 225-243
  • [14] Halverson K(2004)Reasoning as a scientist: ways of helping children to use language to learn science British Educational Research Journal 30 359-377
  • [15] Siegel M(2011)Mismatches between ‘scientific’ and ‘non-scientific’ ways of knowing and their contributions to public understanding of science Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science 45 201-215
  • [16] Freyermuth S(2013)Dialectical features of students’ argumentation: a critical review of argumentation studies in science education Research in Science Education 43 371-393
  • [17] Irez S(2011)Argumentation, dialogue theory, and probability modeling: alternative frameworks for argumentation research in education Educational Psychology 46 84-106
  • [18] Kim M(2004)Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science Journal of Research in Science Teaching 41 994-1020
  • [19] Tan A-L(2008)Participation, value rationality and mutual learning in transdisciplinary knowledge production for sustainable development Environmental Education Research 14 643-653
  • [20] King K(2004)Transdisciplinarity and its challenges: the case of urban studies Futures 36 423-439