Decision Making Through Dialogue: a Case Study of Analyzing Preservice Teachers’ Argumentation on Socioscientific Issues

[1] Abd-Al-Khalick F(2000)Improving science teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: a critical review of the literature International Journal of Science Education 22 665-701

[2] Lederman N(2000)Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms Science Education 84 287-312

[3] Driver R(2002)Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education Studies in Science Education 38 39-72

[4] Newton P(2010)Students’ use of decision-making strategies with regard to socioscientific issues: an application of the Rasch partial credit model Science Education 94 230-258

[5] Osborne J(2004)TAPing into argumentation: developments in the application of Toulmin’s argument pattern for studying science discourse Science Education 88 915-933

[6] Duschl R(2008)Knowledge integration: a key challenge for transdisciplinary cooperation Environmental Education Research 14 625-641

[7] Osborne J(2009)Lenses for framing decisions: undergraduates’ decision making about stem cell research International Journal of Science Education 31 1249-1268

[8] Eggert S(2006)Are we prepared? An assessment of preservice science teacher educators’ beliefs about nature of science Science Education 90 1113-1143

[9] Bögeholz S(2011)Rethinking difficulties of teaching inquiry-based practical work: stories from elementary pre-service teachers International Journal of Science Education 33 465-486

[10] Erduran S(2001)Science education in an urban elementary school: case studies of teacher beliefs and classroom practices Science Education 85 89-110

[1] Abd-Al-Khalick F(2000)Improving science teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: a critical review of the literature International Journal of Science Education 22 665-701

[2] Lederman N(2000)Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms Science Education 84 287-312

[3] Driver R(2002)Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education Studies in Science Education 38 39-72

[4] Newton P(2010)Students’ use of decision-making strategies with regard to socioscientific issues: an application of the Rasch partial credit model Science Education 94 230-258

[5] Osborne J(2004)TAPing into argumentation: developments in the application of Toulmin’s argument pattern for studying science discourse Science Education 88 915-933

[6] Duschl R(2008)Knowledge integration: a key challenge for transdisciplinary cooperation Environmental Education Research 14 625-641

[7] Osborne J(2009)Lenses for framing decisions: undergraduates’ decision making about stem cell research International Journal of Science Education 31 1249-1268

[8] Eggert S(2006)Are we prepared? An assessment of preservice science teacher educators’ beliefs about nature of science Science Education 90 1113-1143

[9] Bögeholz S(2011)Rethinking difficulties of teaching inquiry-based practical work: stories from elementary pre-service teachers International Journal of Science Education 33 465-486

[10] Erduran S(2001)Science education in an urban elementary school: case studies of teacher beliefs and classroom practices Science Education 85 89-110