Breeding behaviour of Kunzea pomifera (Myrtaceae): self-incompatibility, intraspecific and interspecific cross-compatibility

被引:0
作者
T. Page
G. M. Moore
J. Will
G. M. Halloran
机构
[1] James Cook University,Agroforestry and Novel Crops Unit, School of Marine and Tropical Biology
[2] The University of Melbourne,Melbourne School of Land and Environment
[3] The University of Melbourne,Melbourne School of Land and Environment
来源
Sexual Plant Reproduction | 2010年 / 23卷
关键词
Hybridisation incongruity; Interspecific crosses; Self-incompatibility;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To examine breeding system characteristics of the endemic Australian prostrate shrub Kunzea pomifera, artificial hybridisations were undertaken using thirteen different genotypes of K. pomifera, to elucidate: (1) self-incompatibility, (2) intraspecific cross-compatibility in the species and (3) interspecific cross-compatibility with each of K. ambigua and K. ericoides. K. pomifera exhibited very low self-compatibility, with the barrier to self-fertilisation being prevention of pollen-tube growth in the style or ovary. Following intraspecific pollination amongst a number of different genotypes of K. pomifera, 38.4% of pollinated flowers developed fruit; arrest of compatible pollen-tubes in the style, preventing fertilisation, contributes to the low fruit set in this species. Interspecific compatibility was examined between K. pomifera (pistillate parent) and K. ambigua (staminate parent) where seed set per pollinated flower (4.47) was not significantly different from intraspecific crosses (4.66). In crosses between K. pomifera (pistillate parent) and K. ericoides as staminate plant, 0.037% of pollinated flowers produced fruit, with 0.0075 seeds per pollinated flower. Reproductive barriers between these two species were evident in the style of K. pomifera, where the growing tips of the K. ericoides pollen-tubes swelled and ceased to grow.
引用
收藏
页码:239 / 253
页数:14
相关论文
共 212 条
  • [1] Ahmed AK(2000)Turner review No.3: Horticultural development of Australian native edible plants Aust J Bot 48 417-426
  • [2] Johnson KA(1968)Pollen tube growth and incompatibility following intra- and interspecific pollinations in Am J Bot 55 1230-1234
  • [3] Ascher PD(1998)The evolution of mating strategies in flowering plants Trends Plant Sci 3 335-341
  • [4] Peloquin SJ(1984)Flower, fruit and seed abortion in tropical forest trees—implications for the evolution of paternal and maternal reproductive patterns Amer J Bot 71 736-751
  • [5] Barrett SCH(1993)Breeding system and reproductive success of Aust J Bot 41 333-349
  • [6] Bawa KS(1993) (Myrtaceae) Aust J Bot 41 511-526
  • [7] Webb CJ(1997)Reproductive biology of Australian Myrtaceae Genetics 147 861-877
  • [8] Beardsell DV(2004)An interspecific backcross of Science 303 971-975
  • [9] Knox RB(1989) ×  J Amer Soc Hort Sci 114 733-737
  • [10] Williams EG(2004): linkage analysis and a QTL study of sexual compatibility factors and floral traits Plant Syst Evol 247 241-254