Postoperative evaluation of femoral tunnel position in ACL reconstruction: plain radiography versus computed tomography

被引:0
作者
Christian Hoser
Katja Tecklenburg
Karl Heinz Kuenzel
Christian Fink
机构
[1] University Hospital Innsbruck,Department of Traumatology
[2] University Hospital Innsbruck,Department of Anatomy
来源
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | 2005年 / 13卷
关键词
ACL reconstruction; Femoral tunnel; Plain radiograph; Computed tomography;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Inaccurate femoral tunnel placement has been identified as one of the most frequent errors in failed anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Most surgeons evaluate the femoral tunnel position on plain radiographs but in a lot of cases it is difficult to detect the femoral tunnel. The goal of this study was to compare plain digital radiographs and multiplanar computed tomography (CT) scans for the evaluation of femoral tunnel position. We examined 50 patients 24–60 months postoperatively, following an arthroscopically-assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with central third bone–patellar tendon–bone graft. Endobutton fixation was used on the femoral side and titanium interference screws on the tibial side. Standard antero-posterior and lateral X-rays and a CT scan were obtained from each patient. Sagittal and frontal reconstructions of the CT scan were used for the evaluation. We measured the height of the center of the tunnel in the notch in the frontal plane, and the position of the tunnel along Blumensaat’s line (BL) in the lateral plane. Measurements are reported as percentages of total notch height and of the length of BL. On plain X-rays the tunnel was invisible in 46 cases in the anterior–posterior plane and in eight cases on the lateral plane. The average position in the frontal plane was 89.8%, and in the lateral plane 38.6%. In the CT scans, measurements were able to be done in 48 patients. The frontal-plane position averaged 90.5% and the lateral-plane position 34.1%. Pearson’s correlation coefficient for the values in the lateral plane for CT and X-rays was low at 0.22, with p>0.05. In our group of 50 patients we were able to detect the femoral tunnel on both plains of standard X-rays in only four patients, whereas it was possible to take accurate measurements in 48 patients on reconstructed CT scans. We advocate the use of CT technology for the evaluation of femoral position whenever precise measurements are needed.
引用
收藏
页码:256 / 262
页数:6
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
Amis AA(1994)Proceedings of the ESSKA scientific workshop on reconstruction of the anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2 124-132
[2]  
Beynnon B(2001)Single-incision technique misses the anatomical femoral anterior cruciate ligament insertion: a cadaver study Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 9 194-199
[3]  
Blankevoort L(1994)Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with patellar tendon. Comparison between magnetic resonance and computerized tomography Radiol Med (Torino) 88 378-387
[4]  
Arnold MP(1979)The syndrome of the torn anterior cruciate ligament Orthop Clin North Am 10 81-90
[5]  
Kooloos J(1975)The cruciate ligaments of the knee joint. Anatomical functional and experimental analysis Clin Orthop 106 216-231
[6]  
van Kampen A(1989)Factors affecting the region of most isometric femoral attachments. Part II: the anterior cruciate ligament Am J Sports Med 17 208-216
[7]  
Bagnolesi P(1984)Intra-articular reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. An experimental study of length changes in different ligament reconstructions Clin Orthop 185 197-202
[8]  
Russo R(2001)The relationship between the angle of the tibial tunnel in the coronal plane and loss of flexion and anterior laxity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction Am J Sports Med 29 567-574
[9]  
Battolla L(1981)Bone-block iliotibial-band transfer for anterior cruciate insufficiency J Bone Joint Surg Am 63 560-569
[10]  
Feagin JA(1996)The relationship between tunnel placement and clinical results after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction Am J Sports Med 24 335-341