Prior knowledge and its activation in elementary classroom discourse

被引:0
作者
Courtney Hattan
Patricia A. Alexander
机构
[1] Illinois State University,School of Teaching and Learning
[2] University of Maryland,Department of Human Development and Quantitative Methodology
来源
Reading and Writing | 2020年 / 33卷
关键词
Prior knowledge; Prior knowledge activation; Classroom discourse;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of the current study was to: (a) examine the frequency of prior knowledge (PK) activation in elementary classrooms while students were engaged with text, (b) investigate the relevance of students’ responses to teacher prompts, (c) explore the nature of teachers’ and students’ prior knowledge activation utterances, and (d) investigate whether there were discernible routines in the interactions between teachers and students when activating PK. Participants were 6 teachers and 99 students from a private elementary school in the mid-Atlantic. An analysis of classroom discourse suggested that teachers infrequently prompted students to activate their prior knowledge during reading. Yet, when teachers did prompt PK, they asked about a prior lesson most often, or about a specific text, students’ world knowledge, or their personal experiences. Students then responded to their teachers according to the prompted referential frame. Additionally, four routines of classroom discourse were identified in the data including nonresponsive, question–answer, simple feedback, and interaction routines, with less elaborate routines being most common and primarily occurring at the beginning of lessons.
引用
收藏
页码:1617 / 1647
页数:30
相关论文
共 120 条
[1]  
Alvermann DE(1989)Comprehension of counterintuitive science text: Effects of prior knowledge and text structure Journal of Educational Research 82 197-202
[2]  
Hague SA(1990)What teachers do when they say they’re having discussions of content area reading assignments: A qualitative analysis Reading Research Quarterly 25 296-322
[3]  
Alvermann DE(1985)Prior knowledge and the comprehension of compatible and incompatible text Reading Research Quarterly 20 420-436
[4]  
O’Brien DG(1999)The development of expertise: The journey from acclimation to proficiency Educational Researcher 32 10-14
[5]  
Dillon DR(2005)The path to competence: A lifespan developmental perspective on reading Journal of Literacy Research 37 413-436
[6]  
Alvermann DE(1994)How subject-matter knowledge affects recall and interest American Educational Research Journal 31 313-337
[7]  
Smith LC(1991)Coming to terms: How researchers in learning and literacy talk about knowledge Review of Educational Research 61 315-343
[8]  
Readence JE(2009)What is learning anyway? A topographical perspective consdered. Educational Pscyhologist 44 176-192
[9]  
Alexander PA(2001)The snowball phenomenon: Spread of ways of talking and ways of thinking across groups of children Cognition and Instruction 19 1-46
[10]  
Alexander PA(1977)Frameworks for comprehending discourse American Educational Research Journal 14 367-381