Prediction of Laboratory Peak Shear Stress Along the Cohesive Soil–Geosynthetic Interface Using Artificial Neural Network

被引:20
作者
Debnath P. [1 ]
Dey A.K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Civil Engineering, NIT Silchar, Silchar
关键词
Artificial neural network; Multi-variable regression; Peak shear stress; Sensitivity analysis; Statistical analysis;
D O I
10.1007/s10706-016-0119-2
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In general, soil–geosynthetic interface behaviour is modeled by interface element which involves the assumption of stiffness values which are difficult to determine experimentally. Most of the geosynthetic-reinforced earth structures fail at the interface of the geosynthetic and the soil due to slip or plastic yielding of the reinforced soil. Hence, for a proper design of the soil–geosynthetic interface, an artificial neural network (ANN) model can be used as an alternative approach for the prediction of the soil–geosynthetic interface behavior. The present study uses an ANN model to predict the peak shear stress along the cohesive soil–geosynthetic interface. Three-layer feed-forward back-propagation neural networks with 4, 10 and 15 hidden nodes using three different learning algorithms are examined. Out of three learning algorithms, Bayesian regularization learning algorithm with four hidden nodes is used for its highest coefficient of determination (R2 = 0.988) for the testing set and all of the predicted data falling within the 99% prediction interval. The prediction performance of the ANN model with Bayesian regularization learning algorithm with four hidden nodes is compared with the multi-variable regression analysis. Different sensitivity analyses to quantify the most importance input parameters are also discussed. A neural interpretation diagram to visualize the effect of input parameters on the output is presented. Finally, a predicted model equation is obtained based on the neural network parameters. © 2016, Springer International Publishing Switzerland.
引用
收藏
页码:445 / 461
页数:16
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
Abdel-Baki M.S., Raymond G.P., Numerical analysis of geotextile reinforced soil slabs, In, (1994)
[2]  
Ajdari M., Habibagahi G., Ghahramani A., Predicting effective stress parameter of unsaturated soils using neural networks, Comput Geotech, 40, pp. 89-96, (2012)
[3]  
Andrawes K.Z., Mcgown A., Wilson-Fahmy R.F., Mashhour MM (1982) The finite element method of analysis applied to soil–geotextile systems, Second international conference of geotextiles, pp. 695-700
[4]  
Basudhar P.K., Dixit P.M., Gharpure A., Deb K., Finite element analysis of geotextile-reinforced sand-bed subjected to strip loading, Geotext Geomembr, 26, pp. 91-99, (2008)
[5]  
Box G.E.P., Tiao G.C., Bayesian inference in statistical analysis, (1973)
[6]  
Burd H.J., Brocklehurst CJ (1990) Finite element studies of the mechanics of reinforced unpaved roads, Proceedings of the fourth international conference on geotextiles, geomembranes and related products, pp. 217-221
[7]  
Caudill M., Neural Networks Primer. San Francisco (CA), Miller Freeman Publications, (1989)
[8]  
Caudill M., Butler C., Understanding neural networks: computer explorations, vols 1 and 2, (1992)
[9]  
Neural network study. M.I.T, Lincoln, (1988)
[10]  
Das S.K., Basudhar P.K., Undrained lateral load capacity of piles in clay using artificial neural network, Comput Geotech, 33, 8, pp. 454-459, (2006)