Carbon footprint in Latin American dairy systems

被引:0
作者
José Velarde-Guillén
Claudia Arndt
Carlos A. Gómez
机构
[1] Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina,
[2] International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI),undefined
来源
Tropical Animal Health and Production | 2022年 / 54卷
关键词
Carbon footprint; Latin America; Dairy cattle; Dual-purpose cattle; Tropical; Temperate; Milk yield;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The study reviewed carbon footprint (CF) analyses for milk production in Latin America from cradle to farm gate. The objective was to estimate (1) the effect of feeding management (zero-grazing, semi-confinement, and pasture), (2) cattle system (specialized dairy vs. dual-purpose), and (3) region (tropical vs. temperate) on milk production (kg/cow/day) and CF (kg CO2eq/kg fat and protein corrected milk (FPCM)). A systematic literature review was conducted, and for the final analysis, a total of 32 individual CF (from 11 studies) were used. Studies included in the final analysis allowed to calculate CF per kg FPCM, included upstream emissions calculations, and used the IPCC’s tier 2 approach for enteric methane emissions. The range of the CF observed in the region was from 1.54 to 3.57 kg CO2eq/kg FPCM. Feeding management had a significant effect on milk production, but not on CF. Zero-grazing compared with pasture systems had a 140% greater milk production (20.1 vs. 8.4 kg milk/cow/day), but numerically greater CF for pasture systems (2.6 vs. 1.7 kg CO2eq/kg FPCM). Compared with specialized dairy cattle, dual-purpose cattle produced less milk (P < 0.001) and higher CF (P < 0.05). Compared with temperate regions, tropical region systems produced less milk and higher CF. In conclusion, in Latin America, the cattle system and region have a significant impact on CF, whereas the feeding management (zero-grazing, semi-confinement, and pasture) does not impact the CF of milk produced.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 175 条
[1]  
Alvarado-Bolovich V(2021)Enteric methane emissions from lactating dairy cows grazing cultivated and native pastures in the high Andes of Peru Livestock Science 243 1494-1505
[2]  
Medrano J(2011)Life cycle assessment of milk produced in two smallholder dairy systems in the highlands and the coast of Peru Journal of Cleaner Production 19 121-129
[3]  
Haro J(2015)Carbon footprint of milk from sheep farming systems in northern Spain including soil carbon sequestration in grasslands Journal of Cleaner Production 104 2147-2158
[4]  
Castro-Montoya J(2011)Invited review: Are adaptations present to support dairy cattle productivity in warm climates? Journal of Dairy Science 94 451-462
[5]  
Dickhoefer U(2014)Does multifunctionality matter to US farmers? Farmer motivations and conceptions of multifunctionality in dairy systems Journal of Environmental Management 146 146-153
[6]  
Gómez C(2014)Generic model for calculating carbon footprint of milk using four different life cycle assessment modelling approaches Journal of Cleaner Production 73 156-165
[7]  
Bartl K(2013)Modelling the interactions between C and N farm balances and GHG emissions from confinement dairy farms in northern Spain Science of the Total Environment 465 1089-1110
[8]  
Gómez CA(2020)The impact of low-input grass-based and high-input confinement-based dairy systems on food production, environmental protection, and resource use Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 44 5904-5917
[9]  
Nemecek T(2014)Feeding strategies and manure management for cost-effective mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from dairy farms in Wisconsin Journal of Dairy Science 97 420-430
[10]  
Batalla I(2011)How does co-product handling affect the carbon footprint of milk? Case study of milk production in New Zealand and Sweden The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 16 205-1017