Contours of the marketing literature: Text, context, point-of-view, research horizons, interpretation, and influence in marketing

被引:0
作者
Clark T. [1 ]
Key T.M. [2 ]
Azab C. [3 ]
机构
[1] Department of Marketing, College of Business, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, 62901, IL
[2] Department of Marketing, Strategy, and International Business, College of Business and Administration, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs, 80918, CO
[3] Department of Marketing, School of Business Administration, Stetson University, Deland, 32723, FL
关键词
Doctoral seminars; Marketing literature; Marketing theory; Markteing influence;
D O I
10.1007/s13162-023-00267-1
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The marketing literature is the elemental material out of which all of our academic articles are created. It is not possible to conduct an empirical study in academic marketing without referencing the theories, arguments, prior studies, and findings of our literature. While observation, scale development and measurement are all signature features of modern academic marketing, they can only be intelligible when contextualized in terms of the history, structure, and development of theory found in our literature. Despite the fact that 75% of the most cited marketing articles are literature-based, conceptual/theoretical in nature (Clark & Key in AMS Review, 11, 416–431, 2021), our discipline has moved in a methodological/mathematical modelling direction (Yadav, 2010; Key et al., 2020). Yet this move has not increased the influence of the field as many expected. Despite this situation, other than a few articles on the literature review, the marketing literature per se has received little attention. In light of this, the purposes of this paper, are to: 1) extend the limited work on the nature and uses of the marketing literature; 2) encourage the development of studies that have proven influential, namely conceptual/theoretical articles; 3) provide materials for doctoral seminars suitable to nurturing a deeper appreciation of the complexities of our literature and its application in theory development; and 4) provide fresh perspectives for marketing scholars in the best uses of our literature. Borrowing from fields that specialize in the study of academic literatures, the authors identify several important features of the marketing literature, including: how our literature as texts differs from spoken research presentations and why this matters; demonstrating why an article’s context, point-of-view, and research horizons are critical to a reasonable interpretation and use of articles; and how academic marketing articles gain influence. © 2023, Academy of Marketing Science.
引用
收藏
页码:232 / 249
页数:17
相关论文
共 73 条
  • [1] Andres A., Measuring Academic Research, (2009)
  • [2] Armstrong J.S., Collopy F., Competitor orientation: Effects of objectives and information on managerial decisions and profitability, Journal of Marketing Research, 33, 2, pp. 188-199, (1996)
  • [3] Bartlett S.J., Reflexivity: A Source-Book in Self-Reference, Amsterdam, Netherlands: Distributors for the, The Role of Reflexivity in Understanding Human Understanding., pp. 3-18, (2017)
  • [4] Baumgartner H., Pieters R., The structural influence of marketing journals: A citation analysis of the discipline and its subareas over time, Journal of Marketing, 67, 2, pp. 123-139, (2003)
  • [5] Brisco N.A., Research and the Journal of Retailing, Journal of Retailing, 1, April, pp. 3-4, (1925)
  • [6] Carhart M.M., On persistence in mutual fund performance, The Journal of Finance, 52, 1, pp. 57-82, (1997)
  • [7] Clark T., Azab C., Key T.M., Marketing’s next era: The scope and impact of marketing’s future, the reach and legacy of Shelby Hunt, Journal of Business Research, (2024)
  • [8] Clark T., Key T.M., The methodologies of the marketing literature: mechanics, uses and craft, AMS Review, 11, pp. 416-431, (2021)
  • [9] Clark T., Key T.M., Azab C., Marketing as an emergent discipline: Commentary on Shelby Hunt’s final contribution to our field, AMS Review, pp. 1-5, (2022)
  • [10] Clark T., Key T.M., Hodis M., Rajaratnam D., The intellectual ecology of mainstream marketing research: An inquiry into the place of marketing in the family of business disciplines, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Sciences, 42, pp. 223-241, (2014)