Dynamic evaluation, regional disparity, and spatial correlation of industrial ecologicalization level in China

被引:0
作者
Yangjie Li
Jing Li
Yingling Zhou
机构
[1] Chongqing Technology and Business University,Research Center for Economy of Upper Reaches of the Yangtze River
[2] Chongqing Finance and Economics College,Institute of Green Development
来源
Environmental Science and Pollution Research | 2022年 / 29卷
关键词
Industrial ecologicalization level; Dynamic evaluation; Regional disparity; Spatial correlation; Pressure-state-response model; Overall entropy method;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
China is the largest energy consumer and CO2 emitter in the world. Industrial ecologicalization (IE) as an effective way to reduce carbon emission and achieve green growth is vital for China to strive to peak carbon dioxide emissions before 2030 and achieve carbon neutrality before 2060. Thus, it is necessary and urgent to evaluate the industrial ecologicalization level (IEL) in China. Based on the connotation and characteristics of IE and PSR model, this paper first establishes a comprehensive evaluation index system of the IEL and then uses the global entropy method (OEM) and spatial data analysis (ESDA) to analyze the dynamic evaluation, regional disparity, and spatial correlation of IEL in China. The results show that: (1) The innovation support and the structure optimization are the main stimulus in improving the IEL in China, whose weights of indexes have reached 0.263 and 0.268. (2) The overall IEL has improved steadily in China but differs significantly among provinces during the research period. (3) The regional disparity of IEL presents the Eastern region is leading, whereas the Middle and Western regions are lagging from a geographical perspective; the Northern Coast and Eastern Coast have ranked the top two compared with other six economic regions. (4) The five provinces, namely Beijing, Tianjin, Shanghai, Jiangsu, and Zhejiang, constitute the main agglomeration areas of IEL in China based on the spatial correlation features. The findings of this paper cannot only provide a theoretical basis and practice reference for IEL evaluation but also benefit more focused policy-making of the sustainable development in China.
引用
收藏
页码:39359 / 39374
页数:15
相关论文
共 137 条
[1]  
Allenby BR(1994)Understanding industrial ecology from a biological systems perspective Environ Qual Manage 3 343-354
[2]  
Cooper WE(2018)Towards a sustainable industrial ecology: implementation of a novel approach in the performance evaluation of Italian regions J Clean Prod 178 220-236
[3]  
Arbolino R(2009)The structure, function, and evolution of a regional industrial ecosystem J Ind Ecol 13 228-246
[4]  
De Simone L(1998)Eco-thermodynamics: economics and the second law Ecol Econ 26 189-209
[5]  
Carlucci F(1998)Exergy, waste accounting, and life-cycle analysis Energy 23 355-363
[6]  
Yigitcanlar T(2019)What makes ecosystem restoration expensive? A systematic cost assessment of projects in Brazil Biol Conserv 240 108274-388
[7]  
Ioppolo G(2020)Energy efficiency improvement opportunities in the global industrial sector Encycl Renew Sustain Mater 5 377-190
[8]  
Ashton WS(2018)Entropy applications in environmental and water engineering Entropy 20 598-49
[9]  
Ayres RU(2014)System dynamics model for analyzing effects of eco-design policy on packaging waste management system Resour Conserv Recy 87 175-831
[10]  
Ayres RU(1997)The importance of LCAs—warts and all J Ind Ecol 1 41-10