Collaborative learning groups’ adoption of shared metacognitive regulation: examining the impact of structuring versus reflection-provoking support and its relation with group performance

被引：0
作者：
Liesje De Backer
Hilde Van Keer
Martin Valcke
机构：
[1] Ghent University,Department of Educational Studies
来源：
European Journal of Psychology of Education | 2021年 / 36卷
关键词：
Shared regulation; Metacognitive support; Performance; Collaborative learning; Higher education;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
This study investigates (1) the impact of structuring versus reflection-provoking support on university students’ adoption of socially shared metacognitive regulation (SSMR) during face-to-face peer tutoring (PT) and (2) the relation between SSMR and group performance. A quasi-experimental design was adopted, involving 72 educational sciences students who were randomly assigned to PT-groups of six. Each group was provided with either structuring (SS) or reflection-provoking (RS) support. The training and closing PT-session of six groups in each support condition were videotaped (48 h). SSMR was studied by means of systematic observation of video-recorded PT sessions, whereas PT groups’ score on the assignment during the last PT session served as performance measure. The results revealed only significant differences in SSMR between both support conditions, when the proportion of students actively involved in SSMR, was taken into consideration. More specifically, PT groups in the RS condition revealed significantly more SSMR in which (nearly) all students are engaged, as compared with PT groups in the SS condition. The correlational analyses further indicated that only SSMR representing a high participation degree of (nearly) all students is significantly positively related to PT groups’ performance.
引用
收藏
页码：1075 / 1094
页数：19
相关论文
共 82 条
[1]  
Azevedo R(2005)Scaffolding self-regulated learning and metacognition: Implications for the design of computer-based scaffolds Instructional Science 33 367-379
[2]  
Hadwin AF(2007)Do learning protocols support learning strategies and outcomes? The role of cognitive and metacognitive prompts Learning and Instruction 17 564-577
[3]  
Berthold K(2011)Socially shared metacognition in dyads of pupils in collaborative mathematical problem-solving processes Learning and Instruction 21 379-393
[4]  
Nückles M(2015)Socially shared metacognitive regulation in asynchronous CSCL in science: Functions, evolution, and participation Frontline Learning Research 3 78-111
[5]  
Renkl A(2017)Socially shared regulation of learning and participation in social interaction in collaborative learning International Journal of Educational Research 81 11-24
[6]  
Iiskala T(2013)New frontiers: Regulating learning in CSCL Educational Psychologist 48 25-39
[7]  
Vauras M(2015)Enhancing socially shared regulation in collaborative learning groups: Designing for CSCL regulation tools Educational Technology Research and Development 63 125-142
[8]  
Lehtinen E(2016)Socially shared regulation of learning in CSCL: Understanding and prompting individual- and group-level shared regulatory activities International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 11 263-280
[9]  
Salonen PK(2016)Recognizing socially shared regulation by using the temporal sequences of online chat and logs in CSCL Learning and Instruction 42 1-11
[10]  
Iiskala T(2014)Productive group engagement in cognitive activity and metacognitive regulation during collaborative learning: Can it explain differences in students’ conceptual understanding? Metacognition and Learning 9 287-307
123456789