Three-year effectiveness of intravenous pamidronate versus pamidronate plus slow-release sodium fluoride for postmenopausal osteoporosis

被引:0
作者
N. Morabito
A. Gaudio
A. Lasco
C. Vergara
F. Tallarida
G. Crisafulli
A. Trifiletti
M. Cincotta
M. A. Pizzoleo
N. Frisina
机构
[1] Palazzo Forte Gonzaga,Department of Internal Medicine
[2] University of Messina,Institute of Biochemistry
[3] University of Messina,undefined
来源
Osteoporosis International | 2003年 / 14卷
关键词
BMD; Bone turnover; Fluoride; Osteoporosis; Pamidronate;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
All currently available and approved therapies for osteoporosis inhibit bone resorption. But, despite their great value, antiresorptive agents are generally not associated with dramatic increases in bone mass. In light of these data, the aim of our prospective, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial, with a 3-year follow up, was to examine the effects of cyclic intravenous pamidronate and fluoride in combination, versus pamidronate alone, on bone mineral density (BMD) at vertebral and femoral levels, biochemical markers of bone turnover, IGF-1 serum levels, and safety and tolerability in 40 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. During the treatment period, pamidronate alone reduced both markers of bone formation and bone resorption, resulting in an increase of BMD, after 3 years, of 7.07% at the lumbar level and of 6.76% at the femoral level. In the group treated with pamidronate and fluoride, markers of bone turnover had a different trend: after 3 years, there was a lower reduction of bone resorption and an increase of bone formation markers, with a concomitant increase in IGF-1 levels. This resulted, after 3 years of treatment, in a marked variation of BMD at the lumbar level (+12.74%) and a reduced, but still significant, increase at the femoral level (3.89%). Spine radiography and clinical evaluation did not reveal any vertebral fractures in either treatment group. In conclusion, the combined use of pamidronate and fluoride produced somewhat larger, continuous increases in BMD, at the lumbar level, than pamidronate alone.
引用
收藏
页码:500 / 506
页数:6
相关论文
共 339 条
[21]  
Ott SM(1988)Risk-benefit ratio of sodium fluoride in primary vertebral osteoporosis Lancet 2 361-365
[22]  
Torner JC(1995)Treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis with slow-release sodium fluoride. Final report of a randomized controlled trial Ann Intern Med 123 401-408
[23]  
Quandt SA(1996)Comparison of nonrandomized trials with slow-release sodium fluoride with a randomized placebo-controlled trial in postmenopausal osteoporosis J Bone Miner Res 11 160-168
[24]  
Reiss TF(1997)Sodium fluoride treatment is a major protector against vertebral and nonvertebral fractures when compared with other common treatments of osteoporosis: a longitudinal, observational study Calcif Tissue Int 60 250-254
[25]  
Ensrud KE(2000)Fluoride for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporotic fractures: a meta-analysis Osteoporos Int 11 727-738
[26]  
Orr-Walker B(2001)Sustained-release sodium fluoride in the treatment of the elderly with established osteoporosis Arch Intern Med 161 2325-2333
[27]  
Wattie DJ(2001)Correct regimen of fluoride and calcium reduces the risk of vertebral fractures in postmenopausal osteoporosis Osteoporos Int 12 800-349
[28]  
Evans MC(1988)A newly developed spine deformity index (SDI) to quantitate vertebral crush fractures in patients with osteoporosis Bone Miner 3 335-192
[29]  
Reid IR(1989)Maintained improvement in calcium balance and bone mineral content in patients with osteoporosis treated with the bisphosphonate APD Bone Miner 5 183-1599
[30]  
Devogelaer JP(1994)Continuous therapy with pamidronate, a potent bisphosphonate, in postmenopausal osteoporosis J Clin Endocrinol Metab 79 1595-1480