Three-year effectiveness of intravenous pamidronate versus pamidronate plus slow-release sodium fluoride for postmenopausal osteoporosis

被引:0
作者
N. Morabito
A. Gaudio
A. Lasco
C. Vergara
F. Tallarida
G. Crisafulli
A. Trifiletti
M. Cincotta
M. A. Pizzoleo
N. Frisina
机构
[1] Palazzo Forte Gonzaga,Department of Internal Medicine
[2] University of Messina,Institute of Biochemistry
[3] University of Messina,undefined
来源
Osteoporosis International | 2003年 / 14卷
关键词
BMD; Bone turnover; Fluoride; Osteoporosis; Pamidronate;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
All currently available and approved therapies for osteoporosis inhibit bone resorption. But, despite their great value, antiresorptive agents are generally not associated with dramatic increases in bone mass. In light of these data, the aim of our prospective, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial, with a 3-year follow up, was to examine the effects of cyclic intravenous pamidronate and fluoride in combination, versus pamidronate alone, on bone mineral density (BMD) at vertebral and femoral levels, biochemical markers of bone turnover, IGF-1 serum levels, and safety and tolerability in 40 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. During the treatment period, pamidronate alone reduced both markers of bone formation and bone resorption, resulting in an increase of BMD, after 3 years, of 7.07% at the lumbar level and of 6.76% at the femoral level. In the group treated with pamidronate and fluoride, markers of bone turnover had a different trend: after 3 years, there was a lower reduction of bone resorption and an increase of bone formation markers, with a concomitant increase in IGF-1 levels. This resulted, after 3 years of treatment, in a marked variation of BMD at the lumbar level (+12.74%) and a reduced, but still significant, increase at the femoral level (3.89%). Spine radiography and clinical evaluation did not reveal any vertebral fractures in either treatment group. In conclusion, the combined use of pamidronate and fluoride produced somewhat larger, continuous increases in BMD, at the lumbar level, than pamidronate alone.
引用
收藏
页码:500 / 506
页数:6
相关论文
共 339 条
[1]  
Liberman UA(1995)Effect of oral alendronate on bone mineral density and the incidence of fractures in postmenopausal osteoporosis: the Alendronate Phase III Osteoporosis Treatment Study Group N Engl J Med 333 1437-1443
[2]  
Weiss SR(1996)Randomised trial of effect of alendronate on risk of fracture in women with existing vertebral fractures: Fracture Intervention Trial Research Group Lancet 348 1535-1541
[3]  
Broll J(1997)Effects of prolonged bisphosphonate therapy and its discontinuation on bone mineral density in post-menopausal osteoporosis Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 46 87-92
[4]  
Minne HW(1997)Use of pamidronate in chronic and acute bone loss conditions Medicina (B Aires) 57 101-108
[5]  
Quan H(2001)Bone mineral density response to long-term bisphosphonate therapy in fibrous dysplasia J Clin Densitom 4 167-172
[6]  
Bell NH(1994)The bone-remodeling transient: implications for the interpretation of clinical studies of bone mass change J Bone Miner Res 9 1515-1523
[7]  
Rodriguez-Portales J(3rd)Increments in bone mineral density of the lumbar spine and hip and suppression of bone turnover are maintained after discontinuation of alendronate in postmenopausal women Am J Med 103 291-297
[8]  
Downs RW(1995)Effects of bisphosphonates APD and HEBP on bone metabolism in vitro Bone 16 317S-327S
[9]  
Dequeker J(2000)Bisphosphonates directly regulate cell proliferation, differentiation, and gene expression in human osteoblasts Cancer Res 60 6001-6007
[10]  
Favus M(1995)Treatment of post-menopausal osteoporosis with a combination of growth hormone and pamidronate: a placebo controlled trial Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 43 557-565