Ondansetron: A review of its use as an antiemetic in children

被引:50
作者
Culy C.R. [1 ]
Bhana N. [1 ]
Plosker G.L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Adis International Limited, Auckland 10
来源
Paediatric Drugs | 2001年 / 3卷 / 6期
关键词
Ondansetron; Metoclopramide; Granisetron; Total Body Irradiation; Droperidol;
D O I
10.2165/00128072-200103060-00007
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Ondansetron, a selective serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT) 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, is an antiemetic agent available for use in adults and children. In children receiving ondansetron (multiple 5 mg/m2 or 0.15 mg/kg intravenous and/or oral doses) in addition to chemotherapy in 2 large (n > 100) noncomparative analyses, ≤2 emetic episodes were observed in 33 and 40% of cisplatin recipients, 48 and 68% of ifosfamide recipients, and 70 and 72% of patients receiving other chemotherapeutic regimens. In comparative trials, ondansetron was significantly more effective at reducing nausea and vomiting than metoclopramide or chlorpromazine (both combined with dexamethasone), although the incidence of delayed symptoms were similar between children receiving ondansetron and metoclopramide. In addition, dexamethasone significantly improved the antiemetic efficacy of ondansetron in 1 randomised trial. When used in children undergoing conditioning therapy (including total body irradiation) prior to bone marrow transplantation, ondansetron was significantly better at controlling nausea and vomiting than combined perphenazine and diphenhydramine therapy. In dose-ranging and large placebo-controlled trials, intravenous (0.075 to 0.15 mg/kg) or oral (0.1 mg/kg) ondansetron was significantly more effective than placebo in preventing emesis in children undergoing surgery associated with a high risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) including tonsillectomy or strabismus repair. In comparative studies, intravenous administration of ondansetron 0.1 to 0.15 mg/kg was significantly superior to droperidol 0.02 to 0.075 mg/kg or metoclopramide 0.2 to 0.25 mg/kg in preventing emesis in children undergoing various surgical procedures. In comparison with other antiemetics, including prochlorperazine and dimenhydrinate, ondansetron generally showed greater prophylactic antiemetic efficacy. Ondansetron combined with dexamethasone was significantly more effective than ondansetron or dexamethasone alone, as was the combination of ondansetron with a propofol-based anaesthetic compared with either agent alone. Ondansetron is generally well tolerated in children, rarely necessitating treatment withdrawal. The most frequently reported adverse events were mild to moderate headache, constipation and diarrhoea in patients receiving chemotherapy. Wound problems, anxiety, headache, drowsiness and pyrexia were reported most frequently in patients postsurgery. Conclusions: Ondansetron has shown good efficacy in the prevention of acute nausea and vomiting in children receiving moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy and/or irradiation, particularly when combined with dexamethasone. In the chemotherapy setting, ondansetron is significantly better than metoclopramide and chlorpromazine and has a more favourable tolerability profile. In children undergoing surgery, ondansetron demonstrated superior prophylactic antiemetic efficacy compared with placebo, droperidol and metoclopramide, and was relatively free of adverse events. Ondansetron is thus an effective first-line antiemetic in children undergoing chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:441 / 479
页数:38
相关论文
共 136 条
[1]  
Milne R.J., Heel R.C., Ondansetron: Therapeutic use as an antiemetic, Drugs, 41, 4, pp. 574-595, (1991)
[2]  
Markham A., Sorkin E.M., Ondansetron: An update of its therapeutic use in chemotherapy-induced and postoperative nausea and vomiting, Drugs, 45, 6, pp. 931-952, (1993)
[3]  
Wilde M.I., Markham A., Ondansetron: A review of its pharmacology and preliminary clinical findings in novel applications, Drugs, 52, pp. 773-794, (1996)
[4]  
Kohler D.R., Goldspiel B.R., Ondansetron: A serotonin receptor (5-HT<sub>3</sub>) antagonist for antineoplastiC chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, DICP, 25, pp. 367-380, (1991)
[5]  
Roberson C.R., McLeskey C.H., Ondansetron: In a class (5HT<sub>3</sub>) of its own, Semin Anesth, 15, 1, pp. 41-46, (1996)
[6]  
Veyrat-Follet C., Farinotti R., Palmer J.L., Physiology of chemotherapy-induced emesis and antiemetic therapy: Predictive models for evaluation of new compounds, Drugs, 53, 2, pp. 206-234, (1997)
[7]  
Gregory R.E., Ettinger D.S., 5-HT3 receptor antagonists for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: A comparison of their pharmacology and clinical efficacy, Drugs, 55, pp. 173-189, (1998)
[8]  
Perez E.A., A risk-benefit assessment of serotonin 5-HT<sub>3</sub> receptor antagonists in antineoplastic therapy-induced emesis, Drug Saf, 18, pp. 43-56, (1998)
[9]  
Scbworer H., Racke K., Kilbinger H., Cisplatin increases the release of 5-bydroxytryptamine (5-HT) from the isolated vascularly perfused small intestine of the guinea-pig: Involvement of 5-HT<sub>3</sub> receptors, Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol, 344, pp. 143-149, (1991)
[10]  
Perez E.A., Review of the preclinical pharmacology and comparative efficacy of 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonists for chemotherapy-induced emesis, J Clin Oncol, 13, 4, pp. 1036-1043, (1995)