A scoping review on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals

被引：0
作者：
Ketevan Glonti
Daniel Cauchi
Erik Cobo
Isabelle Boutron
David Moher
Darko Hren
机构：
[1] Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences,Department of Psychology, University of Split
[2] INSERM,Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery
[3] U1153 Epidemiology and Biostatistics Sorbonne Paris Cité Research Center (CRESS),Statistics and Operations Research Department
[4] Methods of Therapeutic Evaluation Of Chronic Diseases Team (METHODS),Center for Journalology, Clinical Epidemiology Program
[5] Paris Descartes University,undefined
[6] Sorbonne Paris Cité,undefined
[7] University of Malta,undefined
[8] Barcelona-Tech,undefined
[9] UPC,undefined
[10] Ottawa Hospital Research Institute,undefined
来源：
BMC Medicine | / 17卷
关键词：
Biomedical; Roles; Tasks; Competencies; Journal; Peer reviewer; Scoping review;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 86 条
[1]  
Bruce R(2016)Impact of interventions to improve the quality of peer review of biomedical journals: a systematic review and meta-analysis BMC Med 14 85-97
[2]  
Chauvin A(1994)Peer review: crude and understudied, but indispensable JAMA. 272 96-1586
[3]  
Trinquart L(2016)Increasing value and reducing waste in biomedical research: who’s listening? Lancet. 387 1573-32
[4]  
Ravaud P(2015)Four proposals to help improve the medical research literature PLoS Med 12 e1001864-46
[5]  
Boutron I(2015)The most important tasks for peer reviewers evaluating a randomized controlled trial are not congruent with the tasks most often requested by journal editors BMC Med 13 1-2032
[6]  
Kassirer JP(2016)A scoping review of competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals BMC Med 14 16-1057
[7]  
Campion EW(2017)Core competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals: consensus statement BMC Med 15 167-17
[8]  
Moher D(2005)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework Int J Soc Res Methodol 8 19-12
[9]  
Glasziou P(2010)Scoping studies: advancing the methodology Implement Sci IS 5 69-210
[10]  
Chalmers I(2018)Editors’ perspectives on the peer-review process in biomedical journals: protocol for a qualitative study BMJ Open 8 e020568-undefined
123456789