Is Abortion Included in Maternal and Child Health Curricula in the United States?

被引:0
作者
Meredith Burns
Roger Rochat
Amy G. Bryant
Kathryn Andersen
机构
[1] University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill,Gillings School of Global Public Health
[2] Ipas,Division of Family Planning, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
[3] Rollins School of Public Health,undefined
[4] University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill,undefined
来源
Maternal and Child Health Journal | 2018年 / 22卷
关键词
Abortion; Maternal and child health; Public health education; Curriculum;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose The purpose of this study is to assess whether Maternal and Child Health (MCH) graduate programs address abortion content in their programs’ foundational courses, elective courses, and general curricula. Description Between January and March 2017, we conducted a descriptive study with faculty from the 13 Centers of Excellence in Maternal and Child Health Education, Science and Practice (COEs). We reviewed syllabi and discussed foundational and elective course content via email and key informant interviews with COE faculty. We categorized abortion coverage in foundational courses as “transparent” or “tangential” depending on inclusion of the word “abortion” in course syllabi. We identified electives addressing abortion as “electives including abortion” and courses that focus on abortion as “abortion-specific electives.” Assessment Evidence demonstrated that most programs do not transparently address abortion in required course curricula. Only one of 13 COEs transparently addresses abortion in the foundational course(s); seven COEs tangentially include abortion in foundational courses; and all programs address abortion in some capacity though no standard exists to ensure its inclusion. Despite barriers, including avoidance of controversy and fear of losing funding, COEs could address abortion by establishing shared curricular standards, facilitating values clarification and attitude transformation activities, utilizing information-sharing networks, strengthening relationships between MCH programs and abortion-related organizations, and using professional societies. The scope of our study does not allow us to conclude why abortion content is lacking nor the quality of current content. Conclusion MCH programs should transparently incorporate abortion content in foundational and electives courses to educate students on how to engage with complex and sometimes stigmatized public health issues.
引用
收藏
页码:1556 / 1562
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
Foster A(2011)Increasing access to abortion Obstetrics & Gynecology 118 389-391
[2]  
Polis C(2006)Abortion education in nurse practitioner, physician assistant and certified nurse-midwifery programs: A national survey Contraception 73 408-414
[3]  
Allee MK(2010)Obstetrician-gynecologist experiences with abortion training: Physician insights from a qualitative study Contraception 81 525-530
[4]  
Simmonds K(2017)Global, regional, and subregional classification of abortions by safety, 2010-14: Estimates from a Bayesian hierarchical model The Lancet 19 257-264
[5]  
Zurek M(2014)The MCH training program: Developing MCH leaders that are equipped for the changing health care landscape Maternal and Child Health Journal 121 10-13
[6]  
Brown A(2013)The fellowship in family planning International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics 87 6-10
[7]  
Freedman L(2013)The GEMMA Seminar: A graduate public health course on global elimination of maternal mortality from abortion Contraception 34 107-110
[8]  
Landy U(2008)Benefits of a learner-centred abortion curriculum for family medicine residents Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care 96 10481-587
[9]  
Steinauer J(2016)Abortion incidence between 1990 and 2014: Global, regional, and subregional levels and trends The Lancet 48 583-80
[10]  
Ganatra B(2014)Making safe abortion accessible: The public health imperative Global Library of Women’s Medicine 80 74-285