Understanding the Effect of Secondary Structures and Aggregation on Human Protein Folding Class Evolution

被引:0
作者
Tina Begum
Tapash Chandra Ghosh
机构
[1] Bose Institute,Bioinformatics Centre
来源
Journal of Molecular Evolution | 2010年 / 71卷
关键词
Non-Synonymous evolutionary rate; Secondary structures; Solvent accessibility; Fold rate; Protein aggregation; Designability; Regression analysis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Using several model organisms it has been shown earlier that protein designability is related to contact density or fraction of buried residues and influence protein evolutionary rates dramatically. Here, using Homo sapiens as a model organism, we have analyzed two main folding classes (all-α and all-β) to examine the factors affecting their evolutionary rates. Since, secondary structures are the most fundamental components of the protein folding classes, we explored the effect of protein secondary structure composition on evolution. Our results show that sheet and helix fractions exhibit positive and negative correlations, respectively, with the rate of protein evolution. On dividing the secondary structure components according to solvent accessibility, linear regression model identified two factors namely buried sheet fraction and relativeaggregation propensity. Both these factors together can explain about 13.4% variability in the rate of human protein evolution, while buried sheet residues can alone account to 9.9% variability.
引用
收藏
页码:60 / 69
页数:9
相关论文
共 222 条
[11]  
Lipman DJ(2006)Systematically assessing the influence of 3-dimensional structural context on the molecular evolution of mammalian proteomes Mol Biol Evol 23 2131-451
[12]  
Andreeva A(2006)Amino acid propensities for secondary structures are influenced by the protein structural class Biochem Biophys Res Commun 342 441-2972
[13]  
Howorth D(2003)Protein evolution within a structural space Biophys J 85 2962-206
[14]  
Brenner SE(2005)The architecture of the protein domain universe Gene 347 199-307
[15]  
Hubbard TJP(2001)Understanding hierarchical protein evolution from first principles J Mol Biol 312 289-14343
[16]  
Chothia C(2005)Why highly expressed proteins evolve slowly Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102 14338-337
[17]  
Murzin AG(2006)A single determinant dominates the rate of yeast protein evolution Mol Biol Evol 23 327-11168
[18]  
Avarre JC(2002)Designability of alpha-helical proteins Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99 11163-8731
[19]  
Lubzens E(2003)Structural determinant of protein designability Phys Rev Lett 90 218101-1306
[20]  
Babin PJ(2003)Natural selection of more designable folds: a mechanism for thermophilic adaptation Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100 8727-752