Environmental policy integration among multilateral environmental agreements: the case of biodiversity

被引:0
作者
José Octavio Velázquez Gomar
机构
[1] University of Leeds,Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and Environment
来源
International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics | 2016年 / 16卷
关键词
Multilateral environmental agreements; Environmental policy integration; International environmental governance; Synergies; Biodiversity-related conventions;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The system of multilateral environmental agreements (MEAs) comprises hundreds of conventions and protocols designed to protect the environment. Institutional interaction within the MEA system raises issues of environmental policy integration (EPI), i.e. balancing different environmental objectives and considerations. Mainstream proposals for enhancing EPI in environmental governance build upon the assumption that environmental institutions are fragmented. However, recent research reveals that the MEA system has been defragmenting over the years such that EPI is less a problem of institutional fragmentation than of effective management of institutional interplay. This paper examines the factors affecting EPI among MEAs by looking at experiences in the cluster of biodiversity-related multilateral agreements. The analysis is based on a series of interviews with MEA secretariat officials and international experts conducted between September 2011 and January 2012. The paper identifies institutional, political and cognitive barriers constraining interplay management efforts. While some have proposed regulatory changes in the cluster, national-level co-ordination appears to be the best way to advance EPI.
引用
收藏
页码:525 / 541
页数:16
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
Andresen S(2007)The effectiveness of UN environmental institutions International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 7 317-336
[2]  
Biermann F(2009)The fragmentation of global governance architectures: A framework for analysis Global Environmental Politics 9 14-40
[3]  
Pattberg P(2011)The integration of multilateral environmental agreements: Lessons from the biodiversity-related conventions Yearbook of International Environmental Law 22 37-75
[4]  
van Asselt H(2000)Autonomous institutional arrangements in multilateral environmental agreements: A little-noticed phenomenon in international law American Journal of International Law 94 623-659
[5]  
Zelli F(1998)“The synergism hypothesis”: On the concept of synergy and its role in the evolution of complex systems Journal of Social and Evolutionary Systems 21 133-172
[6]  
Caddell R(2008)Escaping the international governance dilemma? Incorporated transgovernmental networks in the European Union Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 21 25-52
[7]  
Churchill RR(2013)The dynamics of regime complexes: Microfoundations and systemic effects Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations 19 119-130
[8]  
Ulfstein G(2009)The causal mechanisms of interaction between international institutions European Journal of International Relations 15 125-156
[9]  
Corning PA(2012)Global green governance: Embedding the green economy in a global green and equitable rule of law polity Review of European Community & International Environmental Law 21 12-22
[10]  
Eberlein B(2007)Designing the United Nations Environment Programme: A story of compromise and confrontation International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 7 337-361