Research on mathematics teachers as partners in task design

被引:0
作者
Keith Jones
Birgit Pepin
机构
[1] University of Southampton,Southampton School of Education
[2] Technische Universiteit Eindhoven,Eindhoven School of Education
关键词
Mathematics education; Teachers; Partners; Partnership; Task design;
D O I
10.1007/s10857-016-9345-z
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Mathematical tasks and tools, including tasks in the form of digital tools, are key resources in mathematics teaching and in mathematics teacher education. Even so, the ‘design’ of mathematical tasks is perceived in different ways: sometimes seen as something distinct from the teaching and learning process, and sometimes as integral to it. Whilst task design has often been carried out by designers or mathematicians (perhaps as textbook authors), the focus for this review article is research that has involved mathematics teachers as partners in the design of tasks. The article provides a state-of-the-art review of relevant literature and is presented under three headings that consider, in turn, the role of mathematical ‘tasks’; the nature of ‘task design’; and the notion of ‘partnerships for task design’ in mathematics education. Subsequently, we present current research that is providing new insights into tasks, task design, and task design partnership. Based on this, we argue that ‘task design’ needs to pay particular attention to what to design, which tools are necessary or beneficial, and under what conditions; digital tools and task resources offer particular affordances that traditional resources cannot provide; and not only do teachers benefit from being partners in task design (in terms of their professional learning) but without their involvement some aspects of task design would most likely be neglected.
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 121
页数:16
相关论文
共 92 条
[1]  
Arbaugh F(2005)Analyzing mathematical tasks: A catalyst for change? Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 8 499-536
[2]  
Brown CA(1996)Reform by the book: What is—Or might be—The role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform? Educational Researcher 25 6-8
[3]  
Ball DL(1983)The constructivist researcher as teacher and model builder Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 14 83-94
[4]  
Cohen D(2009)Conducting design experiments to support teachers’ learning: A reflection from the field Journal of the Learning Sciences 18 165-199
[5]  
Cobb P(2015)Task design for ways of working: Making distinctions in teaching and learning mathematics Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 34 3-14
[6]  
Steffe LP(2005)Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning Educational Researcher 53 159-199
[7]  
Cobb P(1983)Academic work Review of Educational Research 46 305-316
[8]  
Zhao Q(2014)Mathematics teaching development: Learning from developmental research in Norway ZDM: International Journal on Mathematics Education 45 1003-1016
[9]  
Dean C(2015)Collective design of an e-textbook: Teachers’ collective documentation Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 71 199-218
[10]  
Coles A(2013)Collective work with resources: An essential dimension for teacher documentation ZDM: International Journal on Mathematics Education 28 567-590