Trade and welfare effects of a potential free trade agreement between Japan and the United States

被引:0
作者
Timo Walter
机构
[1] University of Hohenheim,
来源
Review of World Economics | 2022年 / 158卷
关键词
New quantitative trade model; Trade policy; Free trade agreement; Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP); F13; F14; F17;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper addresses the trade and welfare implications of a bilateral trade agreement between the U.S. and Japan. In 2019, the two countries signed a “stage one” trade agreement, with the U.S.-Japan Trade Agreement (USJTA) and the U.S.-Japan Digital Trade Agreement as two small trade agreements. A comprehensive bilateral free trade agreement (FTA) is currently under discussion between Washington and Tokyo, with the U.S. government alternatively joining the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for the Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP). Based on the theoretical model of Caliendo and Parro (Rev Econ Stud, 82(1):1–44, 2015) , I analyze the welfare gains of such a bilateral FTA in the style of Aichele et al. (Where is the value added? China’s WTO entry, trade and value chains, ZBW-Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften, Leibniz, 2014). I simulate trade and welfare impacts for the USJTA and the U.S.-Japan Digital Trade Agreement, as well as for a deep bilateral FTA. In addition, I examine and compare the welfare implications of the established CPTPP with the scenario of the U.S. or China joining CPTPP. My findings show that Japan’s welfare increases by 0.3% and U.S. welfare increases by 0.14% as a result of the FTA. Welfare of both countries would increase if the U.S. entered CPTPP, with Japanese welfare being even higher if China acceded to CPTPP.
引用
收藏
页码:1199 / 1230
页数:31
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Baier SL(2007)Do free trade agreements actually increase members’ international trade? Journal of international Economics 71 72-95
[2]  
Bergstrand JH(2015)Estimates of the trade and welfare effects of NAFTA The Review of Economic Studies 82 1-44
[3]  
Caliendo L(2014)Free trade agreements: Impact on US trade and implications for US trade policy Current Politics and Economics of the United States, Canada and Mexico 16 425-540
[4]  
Parro F(2008)Global rebalancing with gravity: Measuring the burden of adjustment IMF Economic Review 55 511-375
[5]  
Cooper WH(2014)The design of international trade agreements: Introducing a new dataset The Review of International Organizations 9 353-1779
[6]  
Dekle R(2002)Technology, geography, and trade Econometrica 70 1741-128
[7]  
Eaton J(2019)Quantifying the EU-Japan economic partnership agreement Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 51 110-71
[8]  
Kortum S(2021)Non-tariff trade policy in the context of deep trade integration: An ex-post gravity model application to the EU-South Korea agreement East Asian Economic Review 25 33-29
[9]  
Dür A(2018)Handels-und Wohlfahrtseffekte einer Nulllösung: Wegfall der EU- und US-Importzölle im Automobilsektor ifo Schnelldienst 71 26-325
[10]  
Baccini L(2017)Quantitative trade models: Developments and challenges Annual Review of Economics 9 295-780