Diversity and Epistemic Marginalisation: The Case of Inclusive Education

被引:0
作者
Kai Horsthemke
机构
[1] University of the Witwatersrand,
来源
Studies in Philosophy and Education | 2021年 / 40卷
关键词
Diversity; Epistemic marginalisation; Epistemological diversity; Inclusive education; Indigenous knowledge; Worldview inclusion;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In the literature on inclusion and inclusive education there is a frequent conflation of (1) inclusion of diverse people, or people in all their diversity, (2) inclusion of diverse worldviews, and (3) inclusion of diverse epistemologies. Only the first of these is plausible—and perhaps even morally and politically mandatory. Of course, more needs to be said about inclusion and its possible difference from integration, conditions of access, etc. Regarding the second type of inclusion, not all worldviews merit inclusion. Moreover, worldviews and epistemologies are not identical: everyone may have a worldview but not everyone has an epistemology. Finally, the idea of diverse epistemologies makes only limited sense, as do the associated notions of ‘indigenous knowledge’, ‘legitimation of knowledge’ and ‘epistemic marginalisation’.
引用
收藏
页码:549 / 565
页数:16
相关论文
共 6 条
[1]  
Bartz Janieta(2018)Recognizing and acknowledging worldview diversity in the inclusive classroom Education Sciences 8 1-13
[2]  
Bartz Thomas(2010)Feminist epistemologies of situated knowledges: Implications for rhetorical argumentation Informal Logic 30 309-334
[3]  
Lang James V(2011)Epistemologies of situated knowledges: “Troubling” knowledge in philosophy of education Educational Theory 61 75-96
[4]  
Lang James V(2012)Situated ignoramuses? Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1 7-12
[5]  
Lang James V(2009)Religion or worldview: Enhancing dialogue in the public sphere Marburg Journal of Religion 14 1-16
[6]  
Valk John(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined