Translation Comes First: Ancient and Convergent Selection of Codon Usage Bias Across Prokaryotic Genomes

被引:0
作者
Francisco González-Serrano
Cei Abreu-Goodger
Luis Delaye
机构
[1] CINVESTAV Irapuato,Genetic Engineering Department
[2] Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México,Centro de Ciencias Genómicas
[3] University of Edinburgh,Institute of Ecology and Evolution
来源
Journal of Molecular Evolution | 2022年 / 90卷
关键词
Translational selection; Genome evolution; Codon usage; Prokaryotes;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Codon usage is the outcome of different evolutionary processes and can inform us about the conditions in which organisms live and evolve. Here, we present R_ENC’, which is an improvement to the original S index developed by dos Reis et al. (2004). Our index is less sensitive to G+C content, which greatly affects synonymous codon usage in prokaryotes, making it better suited to detect selection acting on codon usage. We used R_ENC’ to estimate the extent of selected codon usage bias in 1800 genomes representing 26 prokaryotic phyla. We found that Gammaproteobacteria, Betaproteobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Firmicutes are the phyla/subphyla showing more genomes with selected codon usage bias. In particular, we found that several lineages within Gammaproteobacteria and Firmicutes show a similar set of functional terms enriched in genes under selected codon usage bias, indicating convergent evolution. We also show that selected codon usage bias tends to evolve in genes coding for the translation machinery before other functional GO terms. Finally, we discuss the possibility to use R_ENC’ to predict whether lineages evolved in copiotrophic or oligotrophic environments.
引用
收藏
页码:438 / 451
页数:13
相关论文
共 155 条
[1]  
Alexa A(2021)topGO: enrichment analysis for gene ontology R Package Version 296 751-762
[2]  
Rahnenfuhrer J(2021)Codon usage bias and environmental adaptation in microbial organisms Mol Genet Genomics 25 25-29
[3]  
Arella D(2000)Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology Nat Genet 12 R109-907
[4]  
Dilucca M(2011)Variation in global codon usage bias among prokaryotic organisms is associated with their lifestyles Genome Biol 129 897-469
[5]  
Giansanti A(1991)The selection-mutation-drift theory of synonymous codon usage Genetics 61 456-5044
[6]  
Ashburner M(2005)Insights on the evolution of metabolic networks of unicellular translationally biased organisms from transcriptomic data and sequence analysis J Mol Evol 32 5036-8
[7]  
Ball CA(2004)Solving the riddle of codon usage preferences: a test for translational selection Nucleic Acids Res 10 1-E4949
[8]  
Blake JA(2009)Metabolic-network-driven analysis of bacterial ecological strategies Genome Biol 115 E4940-1307
[9]  
Botstein D(2018)Codon usage of highly expressed genes affects proteome-wide translation efficiency Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 172 1301-213
[10]  
Butler H(2006)Estimating the “effective number of codons”: the wright way of determining codon homozygosity leads to superior estimates Genetics 9 213-321