Impact of various issues on extending the useful life of a product through product recovery options

被引：1

作者：

Mukherjee K. ^{[1
]}

Mondal S. ^{[2
]}

Chakraborty K. ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Indian Institute of Management, Kashipur

[2] Indian Institute of Technology (Indian School of Mines), Dhanbad

来源：

Journal of Remanufacturing | 2017年 / 7卷 / 1期

关键词：

Fuzzy Interpretive structural modelling; Product life cycle; Product recovery options;

D O I：

10.1007/s13243-017-0034-6

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Due to the growing consciousness towards environment and stringent governmental legislations, manufacturers are incorporating product recovery activities in their business processes. In product recovery process, used products are collected after their end-of-use from the customers and their retained usable values are recovered through value additive operations. The product recovery options not only reduce the disposal of wastes but also extend the useful life of product. In this paper, we try to identify various issues from literature review, which influence the extension of useful life of products through product recovery options. These issues are further classified into five major decision areas namely product design issues, operational issues, market related issues, governmental rules and legislations, and societal issues. The contextual relationships among these set of issues are studied by using Fuzzy Interpretive Structural Modelling (FISM), which reflects different levels of influence. Two case studies are highlighted here to compare the contextual relationships among these decision-making issues. The issues in the highest-level act as the prime enablers which trigger the extension of product life and help in formation of corporate strategies. The issues in the lower level generally act as operational issues. © 2017, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.

引用

页码：77 / 95

页数：18

共 31 条

[1]

Kobayashi H., Strategic evolution of eco-products: a product life cycle planning methodology, Res Eng Des, 16, 1-2, pp. 1-16, (2005)

[2]

Mondal S., Mukherjee K., Buy-back policy decision in managing reverse logistics, Int J Logistics Systems and Management, 2, 3, pp. 255-264, (2006)

[3]

Galberth B., Optimal acquisition and sorting policies for remanufacturing, Prod Oper Manag, 15, 3, pp. 384-392, (2006)

[4]

Teunter H.R., Flapper P.D.S., Optimal Core acquisition and remanufacturing policies under uncertain core quality fractions, European Journal of Operation Research, pp. 241-248, (2010)

[5]

Wassenhove L.K.V., Zikopoulos C., On the effect of quality overestimation in remanufacturing, Int J Prod Res, 48, 18, pp. 5263-5280, (2010)

[6]

Guide V.D.R., Teunter H.R., Van Wassenhove L.N., Matching demand and supply to maximize profits from remanufacturing, Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 5, 4, pp. 303-316, (2003)

[7]

Ferguson M., Guide V.D.J., Koca E., Souza G.C., The value of quality grading in remanufacturing, Prod Oper Manag, 18, 3, pp. 300-314, (2009)

[8]

Fleischmann M., Bloemhof-Ruwaard M.J., Dekker R., Van der Laan E., Van Nunen J.A.E.E., Van Wassenhove L.N., Quantitative models for reverse logistics: a review, Eur J Oper Res, 103, pp. 1-17, (1997)

[9]

El Saadany A.M.A., Jaber M.Y., A production/remanufacture model with returns subassemblies managed differently, Int J Prod Econ, 133, pp. 119-126, (2011)

[10]

Fleischmann M., Krikke H.R., Dekker R., Flapper S.D.P., A characterisation of logistics networks for product recovery, Omega, 28, 6, pp. 653-666, (2000)

← 1 2 3 4 →