Pre-implantation genetic testing in ART: who will benefit and what is the evidence?

被引:0
作者
Alberto Vaiarelli
Danilo Cimadomo
Antonio Capalbo
Giovanna Orlando
Fabio Sapienza
Silvia Colamaria
Antonio Palagiano
Carlo Bulletti
Laura Rienzi
Filippo Maria Ubaldi
机构
[1] G.EN.E.R.A. Centers for Reproductive Medicine,Dipartimento di Scienze Anatomiche, Istologiche, Medico Legali e dell’Apparato Locomotore, Sezione Istologia ed Embriologia Medica
[2] GENETYX,Physiopathology of Reproduction Unit
[3] Molecular Biology Laboratory,undefined
[4] University of Rome “Sapienza”,undefined
[5] Second University of Naples,undefined
[6] Cattolica General Hospital,undefined
来源
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics | 2016年 / 33卷
关键词
PGD; PGD-A; Blastocyst; IVF; Aneuploidy testing; Counselling;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy testing (PGD-A) is a tool to identify euploid embryos during IVF. The suggested populations of patients that can benefit from it are infertile women of advanced maternal age, with a history of recurrent miscarriages and/or IVF failures. However, a general consensus has not yet been reached.After the clinical failure of its first version based on cleavage stage biopsy and 9 chromosome-FISH analysis, PGD-A is currently performed by 24 chromosome screening techniques on trophectoderm (TE) biopsies. This approach has been clearly demonstrated to involve a higher clinical efficiency with respect to the standard care, in terms of sustained pregnancy rate per transfer and lower miscarriage rate. However, data about PGD-A efficacy calculated on a per intention-to-treat basis, as well as an analysis of its cost-effectiveness, are still missing.TE biopsy is a safe and extensively validated approach with low biological and technical margin of error. Firstly, the prevalence of mosaic diploid/aneuploid blastocysts is estimated to be between 0 and 16 %, thus largely tolerable. Secondly, all the comprehensive chromosome screening (CCS) technologies adapted to, or designed to conduct PGD-A are highly concordant, and qPCR in particular has been proven to show the lowest false positive error rate (0.5 %) and a clinically recognizable error rate per blastocyst of just 0.21 %.In conclusion, there is a sufficient body of evidence to support the clinical application of CCS-based PGD-A on TE biopsies. The main limiting factor is the need for a high-standard laboratory to conduct blastocyst culture, biopsy and vitrification without impacting embryo viability.
引用
收藏
页码:1273 / 1278
页数:5
相关论文
共 167 条
[1]  
Handyside AH(1990)Pregnancies from biopsied human preimplantation embryos sexed by Y-specific DNA amplification Nature 344 768-70
[2]  
Kontogianni EH(2014)ESHRE PGD Consortium data collection XII: cycles from January to December 2009 with pregnancy follow-up to October 2010 Hum Reprod 29 880-903
[3]  
Hardy K(2006)ESHRE PGD Consortium data collection V: cycles from January to December 2002 with pregnancy follow-up to October 2003 Hum Reprod 21 3-21
[4]  
Winston RM(2012)Human aneuploidy: mechanisms and new insights into an age-old problem Nat Rev Genet 13 493-504
[5]  
Moutou C(2001)To err (meiotically) is human: the genesis of human aneuploidy Nat Rev Genet 2 280-91
[6]  
Goossens V(2011)Preimplantation genetic screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs Hum Reprod Update 17 454-66
[7]  
Coonen E(2014)Correlation between standard blastocyst morphology, euploidy and implantation: an observational study in two centers involving 956 screened blastocysts Hum Reprod 29 1173-81
[8]  
De Rycke M(2012)Methods for comprehensive chromosome screening of oocytes and embryos: capabilities, limitations, and evidence of validity J Assist Reprod Genet 29 381-90
[9]  
Kokkali G(2000)Chromosome analysis of blastomeres from human embryos by using comparative genomic hybridization Hum Genet 106 210-7
[10]  
Renwick P(2000)Comprehensive chromosomal analysis of human preimplantation embryos using whole genome amplification and single cell comparative genomic hybridization Mol Hum Reprod 6 1055-62