In-stent fractional flow reserve variations and related optical coherence tomography findings: the FFR–OCT co-registration study

被引:0
作者
Stylianos A. Pyxaras
Tom Adriaenssens
Emanuele Barbato
Giovanni Jacopo Ughi
Luigi Di Serafino
Frederic De Vroey
Gabor Toth
Shengxian Tu
Johan H. C. Reiber
Jeroen J. Bax
William Wijns
机构
[1] OLV Clinic,Cardiovascular Research Center Aalst
[2] Landshut-Achdorf Hospital,I Medizinische Klinik
[3] University Hospitals Leuven,Cardiovascular Diseases
[4] KU Leuven,Department of Cardiovascular Sciences
[5] University Heart Center Graz,Division of Image Processing, Department of Radiology
[6] Leiden University Medical Center,School of Biomedical Engineering
[7] Shanghai Jiao Tong University,Department of Cardiology, Heart & Lung Center
[8] Leiden University Medical Center,The Lambe Institute for Translational Medicine and Curam
[9] National University of Ireland,undefined
[10] Galway,undefined
[11] Saolta University Healthcare Group,undefined
来源
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging | 2018年 / 34卷
关键词
Fractional flow reserve; Optical coherence tomography; Stable coronary artery disease; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Drug-eluting stent;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We sought to assess in-stent variations in fractional flow reserve (FFR) in patients with previous percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and to associate any drop in FFR with findings by optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging. Suboptimal post-PCI FFR values were previously associated with poor outcomes. It is not known to which extent in-stent pressure loss contributes to reduced FFR. In this single-arm observational study, 26 patients who previously underwent PCI with drug-eluting stent or scaffold implantation were enrolled. Motorized FFR pullback during continuous intravenous adenosine infusion and OCT assessments was performed. Post-PCI FFR < 0.94 was defined as suboptimal. At a median of 63 days after PCI (interquartile range: 59–64 days), 18 out of 26 patients (72%) had suboptimal FFR. The in-stent drop in FFR was significantly higher in patients with suboptimal FFR vs. patients with optimal FFR (0.08 ± 0.07 vs. 0.01 ± 0.02, p < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that an in-stent FFR variation of > 0.03 was associated with suboptimal FFR. In patients with suboptimal FFR, the OCT analyses revealed higher mean neointimal area (respectively: 1.06 ± 0.80 vs. 0.51 ± 0.23 mm2; p = 0.018) and higher neointimal thickness of covered struts (respectively 0.11 ± 0.07 vs. 0.06 ± 0.01 mm; p = 0.021). Suboptimal FFR values following stent-implantation are mainly caused by significant in-stent pressure loss during hyperemia. This finding is associated to a larger neointimal proliferation.
引用
收藏
页码:495 / 502
页数:7
相关论文
共 88 条
  • [1] Shaw LJ(2008)Optimal medical therapy with or without percutaneous coronary intervention to reduce ischemic burden: results from the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) trial nuclear substudy Circulation 117 1283-1291
  • [2] Berman DS(2009)Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention N Engl J Med 360 213-224
  • [3] Maron DJ(2012)Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease N Engl J Med 367 991-1001
  • [4] Tonino PA(2012)Short- and long-term outcomes with drug-eluting and bare-metal coronary stents: a mixed-treatment comparison analysis of 117 762 patient-years of follow-up from randomized trials Circulation 125 2873-2891
  • [5] De Bruyne B(2012)Stent thrombosis with drug-eluting and bare-metal stents: evidence from a comprehensive network meta-analysis Lancet 379 1393-1402
  • [6] Pijls NH(1996)Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses N Engl J Med 334 1703-1708
  • [7] De Bruyne B(1995)Fractional flow reserve. A useful index to evaluate the influence of an epicardial coronary stenosis on myocardial blood flow Circulation 92 3183-3193
  • [8] Pijls NH(1999)Comparison of quantitative coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound, and coronary pressure measurement to assess optimum stent deployment Circulation 99 1015-1021
  • [9] Kalesan B(2014)Incomplete stent apposition causes high shear flow disturbances and delay in neointimal coverage as a function of strut to wall detachment distance: implications for the management of incomplete stent apposition Circ Cardiovasc Interv 7 180-189
  • [10] Bangalore S(2001)In vitro study of FFR, QCA, and IVUS for the assessment of optimal stent deployment Cathet Cardiovasc Interv 54 363-375