Collaborative, cross-disciplinary learning and co-emergent innovation in eScience teams

被引:0
作者
Deana D. Pennington
机构
[1] University of Texas at El Paso,
来源
Earth Science Informatics | 2011年 / 4卷
关键词
eScience; Interdisciplinary research; Collaboration; Science of team science;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Collaborative eScience research teams are impeded by difficulties defining problems that provide research opportunities for all participants. Problem formulation occurs early in the collaboration process when the demand for ideas is high. However, cross-disciplinary linkages and integrated conceptual frameworks from which strong interdisciplinary ideas emerge do not evolve until later. The process of co-creating interdisciplinary research ideas is fundamentally a learning problem; participants from different disciplines must learn enough about each other’s research interests to construct an integrated conceptual framework from which joint problems of interest can be created. However, participants rarely have the conceptual background needed to easily understand research topics in other disciplines; hence methods for enabling rapid learning in these situations are needed. Team interactions that more effectively generate interdisciplinary ideas can be enabled based on a better understanding the process of cross-disciplinary, collaborative learning. This article postulates several models of collaborative learning in these settings and discusses the implications for orchestrating team activities to achieve better outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 68
页数:13
相关论文
共 119 条
[31]  
Spiro J(2010)How AI-type uncertainty ideas can improve inter-disciplinary collaboration and education: lessons from a case study J Adv Comput Intell Intell Informat 14 700-298
[32]  
Amaral LAN(2004)Human capital heterogeneity, collaborative relationships, and publication patterns in a multidisciplinary scientific alliance: a comparative case study of two scientific teams Res Policy 33 661-184
[33]  
Hall KL(1999)Human dimensions of ecosystem studies Ecosystems 2 296-297
[34]  
Stokols D(2004)The fuzzy front end of new product development for discontinuous innovations: a theoretical model J Prod Innov Manage 21 170-880
[35]  
Moser RP(2009)A conceptual investigation of the ontological commensurability of spatial data infrastructures among different cultures Earth Sci Inform 2 283-420
[36]  
Taylor BK(2009)Linking big: the continuing promise of evolutionary synthesis Evolution 64–4 871-S115
[37]  
Thornquist MD(1989)Institutional ecology, 'translations' and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 Soc Stud Sci 19 387-78
[38]  
Nebeling LC(2008)The ecology of team science: understanding contextual influences on transdisciplinary collaboration Am J Prev Med 35 S96-224
[39]  
Ehret CC(2006)The role of moderating factors in user technology acceptance Int J Hum Comput Stud 64 53-301
[40]  
Hartswood M(2005)Improvisation and innovative performance in teams Organ Sci 16 203-246