Factor Structure of the CHC Model for the KABC-II: Exploratory Factor Analyses with the 16 Core and Supplementary Subtests

被引:0
作者
Ryan J. McGill
Stefan C. Dombrowski
机构
[1] College of William & Mary,School of Education
[2] Rider University,Department of Graduate Education, Leadership, and Counseling
关键词
KABC-II; Exploratory factor analysis; Intelligence; Schmid-Leiman procedure;
D O I
10.1007/s40688-017-0152-z
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The factor structure of the 16 core and supplementary Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) model subtests for the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children-Second Edition (KABC-II; Kaufman and Kaufman, 2004a) standardization sample samples aged 7–18 (N = 2025) was examined using exploratory factor analytic techniques (EFA) not included in the KABC-II manual (Kaufman and Kaufman, 2004b). The present results failed to replicate the five-factor CHC-based structure posited by the test publisher at school age. Factor extraction for the core battery suggested four factors, whereas five factors were supported for the total battery configuration. When these structures were transformed with the Schmid and Leiman (Psychometrika, 22, 53–61, 1957) orthgonalization procedure, the second-order general factor accounted for larger portions of total and common variance when compared to the reliable variance accounted for by the resulting four and five first-order factors. Users are encouraged to interpret the KABC-II primarily at the level of the Fluid-Crystallized Index (FCI), with additional consideration of the factor-based scores employed with more caution. Implications for clinical interpretation are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:279 / 293
页数:14
相关论文
共 117 条
[1]  
Bangirana P(2009)A preliminary examination of the construct validity of the KABC-II in Ugandan children with a history of cerebral malaria African Health Sciences 9 186-192
[2]  
Seggane M(1950)Tests of significance in factor analysis British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 3 71-85
[3]  
Allebeck P(2012)A tutorial on hierarchically structured constructs Journal of Personality 80 796-846
[4]  
Giordani B(2008)Orthogonal higher order factor structure of the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales-Fifth Edition for children and adolescents School Psychology Quarterly 23 533-541
[5]  
Chandy CJ(2014)Construct validity of the WISC-IV with a referred sample: direct versus indirect hierarchical structures School Psychology Quarterly 29 38-51
[6]  
Opoka OR(2013)WISC-IV and WAIS-IV structural validity: alternate methods, alternate results. Commentary on Weiss et al. (2013a) and Weiss et al. (2013b) Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment 31 157-169
[7]  
Byarugaba J(2016)Factor structure of the Differential Ability Scales-Second Edition: exploratory and hierarchical factor analyses with the core subtests Psychological Assessment 28 1475-1488
[8]  
Ehnvall A(2010)Investigation of the factor structure of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV). Exploratory and higher order factor analyses Psychological Assessment 22 827-836
[9]  
Boivin MJ(2016)Factor structure of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fifth Edition: exploratory factor analyses with the 16 primary and secondary subtests Psychological Assessment 28 975-986
[10]  
Bartlett MS(2017)Structural validity of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fifth Edition: confirmatory factor analyses with the 16 primary and secondary subtests Psychological Assessment 29 458-472