Clinical Utility of Serum Tumor Markers and Circulating Tumor Cell Assays in the Treatment of Breast Cancer

被引:0
作者
Vandana G. Abramson
Ingrid A. Mayer
机构
[1] Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center,Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University
来源
Current Treatment Options in Oncology | 2011年 / 12卷
关键词
Breast Cancer; Overall Survival; Tumor Marker; Metastatic Breast Cancer; Circulate Tumor Cell;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Though serum tumor markers and circulating tumor cells (CTCs) have been available to the oncologist for many years, their place in the management of breast cancer remains unclear. Due to issues with sensitivity and specificity, tumor markers are unreliable for the detection of metastases in early stage breast cancer. For patients with metastatic breast cancer without measurable disease (e.g., bone-only disease, pleural effusions, or ascites), it is reasonable to obtain baseline values of serum tumor markers and attempt to correlate them with the first set of scans. In patients with elevated markers at baseline whose tumor marker levels decrease in correlation with an improvement in clinical symptoms, it may be reasonable to use them in conjunction with imaging to help determine whether there is progression of disease. CTCs have been found to hold strong prognostic value for breast cancer in both the early stage and metastatic settings. No large prospective studies to date, however, have shown any predictive value for CTCs and their clinical utility is therefore limited. Whether changing treatment in response to an increase in CTCs without radiologic progression results in improvements in quality of life or survival remains to be seen. CTCs hold great promise in the management of breast cancer and future studies will help delineate their role more appropriately.
引用
收藏
页码:403 / 411
页数:8
相关论文
共 100 条
[1]  
Siegel R(2011)Cancer statistics, 2011: The impact of eliminating socioeconomic and racial disparities on premature cancer deaths CA Cancer J Clin 61 212-36
[2]  
Ward E(2005)Breast cancer metastasis: markers and models Nat Rev Cancer 5 591-602
[3]  
Brawley O(2004)A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer N Engl J Med 351 2817-2826
[4]  
Jemal A(2010)The 70-gene signature as a response predictor for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer Breast Cancer Res Treat. 119 551-558
[5]  
Weigelt B(2008)Structure and function of the cell surface (tethered) mucins Annu Rev Physiol 70 431-457
[6]  
Peterse JL(2009)Mucins in cancer: function, prognosis and therapy Nat Rev Cancer 9 874-885
[7]  
van’t Veer LJ(1998)Summary report on the ISOBM TD-4 Workshop: analysis of 56 monoclonal antibodies against the MUC1 mucin. San Diego, Calif., November 17–23, 1996 Tumour Biol 19 1-20
[8]  
Paik S(1997)Use of Truquant BR radioimmunoassay for early detection of breast cancer recurrence in patients with stage II and stage III disease J Clin Oncol 15 2322-2328
[9]  
Shak S(2003)The follow-up of breast cancer Semin Oncol 30 338-348
[10]  
Tang G(2006)Intensive post-operative follow-up of breast cancer patients with tumour markers: CEA, TPA or CA15.3 vs MCA and MCA-CA15.3 vs CEA-TPA-CA15.3 panel in the early detection of distant metastases BMC Cancer 6 269-62