Measuring the spatiotemporal variation and evolution of transport network of China’s megaregions

被引:0
作者
Ge Song
Jiawen Yang
机构
[1] University of Science and Technology of China,School of Management
[2] Peking University,School of Urban Planning and Design
[3] Shenzhen Graduate School,undefined
来源
Journal of Geographical Sciences | 2016年 / 26卷
关键词
China; megaregions; transport network; accessibility; GIS transport network model;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Megaregion has become a prominent feature of modern China. Reflecting upon China’s recent path of transport infrastructure construction, this research examines the spatiotemporal characteristics of transport network development and its accessibility impacts in China’s ten megaregions from 1982 to 2010. Using historical transport network data and multiple national censuses (1982, 1990, 2000 and 2010), we computed two levels of indicators of megaregional transport network: megaregion level and county level, and analyzed the intra-megaregion and inter-megaregion disparities of transport network of the ten megaregions of China. Transport networks at the megaregion level are measured by three indicators: 1) transport network density; 2) infrastructure endowment per capita; and 3) size of transport network’s standard ellipse. Two accessibility indicators for measuring transportation network at the county level are calculated: weighted average travel time and potential accessibility. The research results show the following: 1) Road and rail network densities witnessed the greatest growth during the 2000–2010 period, and growth was more significant for railway network. 2) By 2010, average road endowments per capita in inland megaregions became higher than in coastal megaregions, while average rail endowments per capita in coastal megaregions became higher than in inland megaregions. 3) The sizes and directions of the standard deviational ellipses of road and rail network changed continuously during the study period. However the changes of road network ellipses were relatively small, while the changes of railway network ellipses were more significant. 4) Megaregions have all benefited significantly from transportation infrastructure improvement in the past few decades in terms of WATT and potential accessibility, but the three giant megaregions benefited most.
引用
收藏
页码:1497 / 1516
页数:19
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Cao J(2013)Accessibility impacts of China’s high-speed rail network Journal of Transport Geography 28 12-21
  • [2] Liu X C(2005)A study on the urban accessibility of national trunk highway system in China Acta Geographica Sinica 60 903-910
  • [3] Wang Y(1995)GIS and models of accessibility potential: An application in planning International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 9 67-80
  • [4] Cao X(2001)Location, economic potential and daily accessibility: An analysis of the accessibility impact of the high-speed line Madrid–Barcelona–French border Journal of Transport Geography 9 229-242
  • [5] Xue D(1996)The European high-speed train network: Predicted effects on accessibility patterns Journal of Transport Geography 4 227-238
  • [6] Yan X(1996)Accessibility in the European Union: The impact of the trans-European road network Journal of Transport Geography 4 15-25
  • [7] Geertman S C M(1993)Regional versus local accessibility: Implications for non-work travel Transportation Research Record 1400 58-66
  • [8] Van Ritsema E J R(1997)Measuring accessibility: An exploration of issues and alternatives Environment and Planning A 29 1175-1194
  • [9] Gutiérrez J(2014)Impacts on accessibility of China’s present and future HSR network Journal of Transport Geography 40 123-132
  • [10] Gutiérrez J(2012)Transportation development transition in China Chinese Geographical Science 22 319-333