Weak Independence and Social Semi-Orders

被引:0
作者
Susumu Cato
机构
[1] The University of Tokyo,
来源
The Japanese Economic Review | 2015年 / 66卷
关键词
D63; D71;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper provides variants of Arrow’s impossibility theorem, which states that there exists no non-dictatorial aggregation rule satisfying weak Pareto, independence of irrelevant alternatives and collective rationality. In this paper, independence of irrelevant alternatives and collective rationality are simultaneously relaxed. Weak independence is imposed instead of independence of irrelevant alternatives. Social preferences are assumed to satisfy the semi-order properties of semi-transitivity and the interval-order property. We prove that there exists a vetoer when the number of alternatives is greater than or equal to six.
引用
收藏
页码:311 / 321
页数:10
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Baigent N(1987)Twitching Weak Dictators Journal of Economics 47 407-411
[2]  
Blair DH(1979)Collective Rationality and Dictatorship: The Scope of theArrow Theorem Journal of Economic Theory 21 186-194
[3]  
Pollak RA(1979)Semiorders and Collective Choice Journal of Economic Theory 21 195-206
[4]  
Blau JH(2000)Weak Independence and Veto Power Economics Letters 66 183-189
[5]  
Campbell DE(2010)Brief Proofs of Arrovian Impossibility Theorems Social Choice and Welfare 35 267-284
[6]  
Kelly JS(2012)Social Choice without the Pareto Principle: A Comprehensive Analysis Social Choice and Welfare 39 869-889
[7]  
Cato S(2013)Quasi-Decisiveness, Quasi-Ultrafilter, and Social Quasi-Orderings Social Choice and Welfare 41 169-202
[8]  
Cato S(2013)Social Choice, the Strong Pareto Principle, and Conditional Decisiveness Theory and Decision 75 563-579
[9]  
Cato S(2014)Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives Revisited Theory and Decision 76 511-527
[10]  
Cato S(1970)Intransitive Indifference with Unequal Indifference Intervals Journal of Mathematical Psychology 7 144-149